2017
DOI: 10.1007/s10035-017-0730-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Performance of PIV and PTV for granular flow measurements

Abstract: As tools and techniques to measure experimental granular flows become increasingly sophisticated, there is a need to rigorously assess the validity of the approaches used. This paper critically assesses the performance of Particle Image Velocimetry (PIV) and Particle Tracking Velocimetry (PTV) for the measurement of granular flow properties. After a brief review of the PIV and PTV techniques, we describe the most common sources of error arising from the applications of these two methods. For PTV, a series of c… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
31
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 56 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
0
31
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Compared to the PIV method, the tags have much larger dimensions. This kind low-cost DPIV set-ups, using free PIV software and high-speed cameras instead of the classical double exposure cameras, have been successfully employed in PIV and liquid-granular PIV applications [ 17 , 18 , 19 ]. The basis for calculating the speed of movement of the tag is the analysis of its movement based on the image of only one image of the fluid flow.…”
Section: Test Stand For Experimental Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Compared to the PIV method, the tags have much larger dimensions. This kind low-cost DPIV set-ups, using free PIV software and high-speed cameras instead of the classical double exposure cameras, have been successfully employed in PIV and liquid-granular PIV applications [ 17 , 18 , 19 ]. The basis for calculating the speed of movement of the tag is the analysis of its movement based on the image of only one image of the fluid flow.…”
Section: Test Stand For Experimental Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Both techniques, based on the analysis of floating tracers, were originally developed for laboratory experiments under controlled conditions and essentially enlarge the basic technique principles of the particle image velocimetry (PIV) and particle tracking velocimetry (PTV) technique to the large-scale cases; LSPIV adopts a Eulerian point of view, while LSPTV uses a Lagrangian point of view. The two techniques have several common characteristics, described for instance in [23,24], while the main differences lay in the adopted procedures for the evaluation of the recordings: LSPIV estimates the velocity at image sub-regions, while LSPTV reconstructs the trajectory of individual particles transiting in the field of view [15].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The convergence limit of 0.01 pixel was employed in the image analysis (DantecDynamics 2013). A typical mean size of sand grain was represented by a patch of 39 3 pixels to minimise any error in the PIV measurements (Gollin et al 2017). Each of these patches was tracked using an adaptive PIV method to identify the deformation field of sand grains between successive images, to a measurement precision of 0.014 mm for the field of view used during these experiments.…”
Section: Digital Particle Image Velocimetry (Dpiv) Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Each of these patches was tracked using an adaptive PIV method to identify the deformation field of sand grains between successive images, to a measurement precision of 0.014 mm for the field of view used during these experiments. The adaptive PIV iteratively adjust the size and the shape of the individual IA in order to adapt to local seeding densities (seeding with particles to create colour coded upon which image processing can operate) and flow gradients (DantecDynamics 2013;Jahanger et al 2016;Gollin et al 2017;Jahanger and Antony 2017a, b;Jahanger et al 2018a, b). This space-pixel dimension of the measurement was calibrated by printing a known scale on the test box along the horizontal and vertical directions.…”
Section: Digital Particle Image Velocimetry (Dpiv) Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%