2009
DOI: 10.2147/aabc.s3619
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Performance of PLS regression coefficients in selecting variables for each response of a multivariate PLS for omics-type data

Abstract: Multivariate partial least square (PLS) regression allows the modeling of complex biological events, by considering different factors at the same time. It is unaffected by data collinearity, representing a valuable method for modeling high-dimensional biological data (as derived from genomics, proteomics and peptidomics). In presence of multiple responses, it is of particular interest how to appropriately “dissect” the model, to reveal the importance of single attributes with regard to individual responses (fo… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
85
1

Year Published

2009
2009
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 88 publications
(86 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
85
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Feature selection was used to identify the top ϳ10% of all metabolic predictors for T1D from each biochemical domain. The full variable set was filtered to retain analytes that dispalyed 1) significant correlation with model scores (Spearman's pFDR Յ 0.05) (58) and 2) model loadings on LV1 in the top 90th quantile in magnitude (41) and Mann-Whitney U-test P values Ͻ 0.05.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Feature selection was used to identify the top ϳ10% of all metabolic predictors for T1D from each biochemical domain. The full variable set was filtered to retain analytes that dispalyed 1) significant correlation with model scores (Spearman's pFDR Յ 0.05) (58) and 2) model loadings on LV1 in the top 90th quantile in magnitude (41) and Mann-Whitney U-test P values Ͻ 0.05.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Feature selection was implemented to identify the top ~10% (42 out of 462) of all metabolic predictors for cancer. The full variable set was filtered to retain metabolites which displayed significant correlation with model scores (Spearman’s pFDR ≤ 0.05) (16) and model loadings on OLV1 in the top 90th quantile in magnitude (17). …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…LMASS was predicted with an R 2 value of 0.62 using two PLS factors. The PLS algorithm produces variable importance (VIP) scores that are used to select the relevant predictors in the model according to the magnitude of their values (Chong andJun 2005, Palermo, Piraino, andZucht 2009). Figure 3 shows the variable importance in the projection (VIP) for the TE and LMASS.…”
Section: Integrating Tree Equivalents and Leaf Mass With Graze And Brmentioning
confidence: 99%