1991
DOI: 10.1193/1.1585645
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Performance of Reinforced Concrete Buildings during the 1985 Chile Earthquake: Implications for the Design of Structural Walls

Abstract: The 1985 Chile earthquake provided a rare opportunity to study the seismic response of buildings with reinforced concrete walls. More than 230 moderate-rise reinforced concrete buildings were located in the coastal city of Vin~a del Mar at the time of the earthquake. The majority of these buildings relied on structural walls to resist vertical and lateral loads. However, the walls did not have the reinforcement details required in current U.S. codes to ensure ductile response. A survey of damage following the … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
15
0

Year Published

1994
1994
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 51 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The companion paper (Panagiotou and Restrepo 2011) presents all the geometry and reinforcing details of the building as well as aspects related to the selection of the test structure. Lightly reinforced bearing wall buildings with wall-toplan area ratios between 2 and 4% have performed very well during past earthquakes (Wood 1991).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The companion paper (Panagiotou and Restrepo 2011) presents all the geometry and reinforcing details of the building as well as aspects related to the selection of the test structure. Lightly reinforced bearing wall buildings with wall-toplan area ratios between 2 and 4% have performed very well during past earthquakes (Wood 1991).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It should be noted that axial load ratio for this specimen is 0.057. For failure of walls without special boundary elements, Wood (1991) showed that shear wall buildings, where the shear walls did not have special boundary elements, did not collapse during the 1985 Chile earthquake due to the large amount of walls. The large amount of walls keeps story drift demands to less than 1.0%, on the other hand, many shear wall buildings were severely damaged, and a few even collapsed, during the 2010 Chile earthquake.…”
Section: Simulated and Non-simulated Collapse Modesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The parameter A, which generally depends on the type of structural system, is later commented in the paper. Inspection of equation (18) suggests that the variability of a depends mainly on the variability of the parameter J". For shear wall buildings, as those designed according to Chilean practice, a good estimate of 1" is 20.…”
Section: Analysis Of a Following Expression Is Widely Usedmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Drd was assumed equal to 0.01 in all cases. The parameter c1 for each analysed earthquake was evaluated using equation (18), h assumed constant and equal to 2.70 m. L was assumed equal to 20 for the Chile earthquake and 10 for the Mexico and US earthquakes. Thus, the corresponding values for a were 339 and 170 m/sec, respectively.…”
Section: Evaluation O F Id For Three Earthquake Ground Motionsmentioning
confidence: 99%