2019
DOI: 10.1002/mrc.4879
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Performance of revised STO(1M)‐3G basis set for prediction of 5‐fluorocytosine chemical shifts

Abstract: Nuclear shieldings and chemical shifts of 5-fluorocytosine (5FC) were predicted in the gas phase and DMSO solution modeled by polarizable continuum model using B3LYP density functional and revised STO(1M)-3G basis set. For comparison, eight arbitrary selected basis sets including STO-3G and medium-size Pople-type and larger dedicated Jensen-type ones were applied.The former basis sets were significantly smaller, but the calculated structural parameters, harmonic vibrational frequencies, were very accurate and … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
3
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
1
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the accuracy decreased significantly when the theory level was lowered, with values of 3.71 ppm/0.24 ppm (level B), 3.81 ppm/0.24 ppm (level C), and 6.00 ppm/0.42 ppm (level D). These results are consistent with previous findings and demonstrate that low quality basis sets (mainly the STO-3G) are unsuitable for accurate NMR calculations …”
supporting
confidence: 93%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, the accuracy decreased significantly when the theory level was lowered, with values of 3.71 ppm/0.24 ppm (level B), 3.81 ppm/0.24 ppm (level C), and 6.00 ppm/0.42 ppm (level D). These results are consistent with previous findings and demonstrate that low quality basis sets (mainly the STO-3G) are unsuitable for accurate NMR calculations …”
supporting
confidence: 93%
“…These results are consistent with previous findings and demonstrate that low quality basis sets (mainly the STO-3G) are unsuitable for accurate NMR calculations. 14 The results obtained with iJ/dJ-DP4 (Figure 2b) were slightly better than the corresponding dJ-DP4 values (Figure 2a), but with a remarkable reduction in the computational cost. Using only a few 3 J HH couplings to constrain the conformational search (typically between 1 and 3), the total number of conformations was reduced by 60% on average (from 13% to 91%).…”
mentioning
confidence: 75%
“…However, the number of computational cycles needed to converge to optimized molecular geometry is reduced while compromising with total computational time when there is used the former method [129]. The small STO-3G basis set and sit improved modifications are used to compute high molecular weight analytes [130][131][132][133][134].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This problem is important for many drugs containing heterocyclic fragments in their structures or F, Cl, Br or I atoms. For such molecules, a worse agreement between experimental and theoretically predicted chemical shifts and the indirect spin–spin coupling constant is usually observed [ 55 , 56 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%