2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2016.07.018
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Performance of self-collected penile-meatal swabs compared to clinician-collected urethral swabs for the detection of Chlamydia trachomatis , Neisseria gonorrhoeae , Trichomonas vaginalis , and Mycoplasma genitalium by nucleic acid amplification assays

Abstract: Men were enrolled in a study to assess the performance and acceptability of self-collected penile meatal swabs as compared to clinician-collected urethral swabs for sexually transmitted infections (STIs). We expected penile-meatal swabs to perform favorably to urethral swabs for Chlamydia trachomatis (CT), Neisseria gonorrhoeae (NG), Trichomonas vaginalis (TV), and Mycoplasma genitalium (MG) detection by nucleic acid amplification assays (NAATs). Of 203 swab pairs tested; for CT, penile-meatal swab sensitivity… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
30
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
1
30
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Future studies should utilise collection of appropriate urethral specimens. Self-collected penile-meatal swabs have been shown to be acceptable for STI testing[ 79 ] and would facilitate self-sampling of the urethral microbiota at home.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Future studies should utilise collection of appropriate urethral specimens. Self-collected penile-meatal swabs have been shown to be acceptable for STI testing[ 79 ] and would facilitate self-sampling of the urethral microbiota at home.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, both analyses showed that the four TMA tests detected all nine strains at a titer at less than 1 GE/ml of specimen, indicating that the risk of a clinical false-negative result due to the analytical sensitivity capability of each test is likely to be small. We also did not have clinical penile meatal swab specimens, a potentially important new specimen type for STI testing (42,43), to compare with test LOD capability in that specimen matrix. Finally, we did not compare test clinical performance to an absolute reference standard such as PCR Sanger sequencing for the identification of M. genitalium infection.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Less-invasive means of specimen collection, such as first-void urine or self-collected vaginal swab options, may promote a higher screening frequency, particularly in scenarios that do not require a physical examination. Furthermore, Dize et al (32) reported that M. genitalium ASR performed on self-collected penile-meatal swabs (investigated in a U.S. STI clinic with 14% M. genitalium prevalence) yielded performance indices equivalent to those derived from clinician-collected urethral swabs.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%