1998
DOI: 10.1061/(asce)0887-3828(1998)12:4(186)
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Performance of Steel Frame Building which Experienced Intense Ground Motion

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Some of these observations are the following. Anderson and Johnston (1998) report the damage of a soft-story steel building that was affected by the Northridge 1994 earthquake. They state that the residual displacement of the ground story of the building was 7.6 cm and it was judged unsafe.…”
Section: Damage Observationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some of these observations are the following. Anderson and Johnston (1998) report the damage of a soft-story steel building that was affected by the Northridge 1994 earthquake. They state that the residual displacement of the ground story of the building was 7.6 cm and it was judged unsafe.…”
Section: Damage Observationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Or as mentioned in the Introduction section, the Northridge earthquake in 1994, and the Alaska earthquake in 1964 where corroded structures experienced more damage and failure than other structures [23].…”
Section: Modeled Steel Moment Frame To Check High Cycle Fatiguementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Corroded steel members are more likely to experience damage and failure when a strong earthquake occurs, for example, the Wen Chuan earthquake in China, the Osaka earthquake in Japan [22], the Northridge earthquake in 1994 [23], and the Alaska earthquake in 1964, where corroded structures experienced more damage and failure than other structures.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, due to the relatively large slenderness ratios of the columns, structures of this type may be susceptible to damage caused by local buckling under constant axial load and cyclic lateral forces [1]. Although there have been numerous experimental and analytical investigations on steel elements, recent research on inelastic behaviors of steel elements subjected to simulated earthquake loading has been somewhat limited [2][3][4][5][6].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%