2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.compstruct.2017.02.032
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Performance of steel pipe reinforced with composite sleave

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…When compared to the replacement of the whole defective pipe section, the cost can be further reduced to approximately 73% [12]. The strength of the repair is governed by the thickness of composite wrap and the tensile stress at each layer of the wrap, where effective stress transfer initiates once plastic flow occurs in the repaired steel pipe [13,14]. Murad et al [15] developed an integrated structural health monitoring approach for composite-based pipeline repair.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When compared to the replacement of the whole defective pipe section, the cost can be further reduced to approximately 73% [12]. The strength of the repair is governed by the thickness of composite wrap and the tensile stress at each layer of the wrap, where effective stress transfer initiates once plastic flow occurs in the repaired steel pipe [13,14]. Murad et al [15] developed an integrated structural health monitoring approach for composite-based pipeline repair.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The advantages of PP pipes contributing to the conquest of the market include easy methods of their processing and installation, low cost, ease of disposal and an acceptable index of influence on the sustainability index. PP products are of universal demand in comparison with many other polymers [ 5 , 6 ], and PP composites are also used to reinforce steel pipes [ 7 , 8 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finite element analysis was performed in conjunction with the strength of the material as well as fracture mechanics-based criteria. Mazurkiewicz et al 11 used composite patch repair to find the final mechanical toughness of the repaired pipe by the finite element approach. Budhe et al 12 proposed a polymer-based composite repair using a hydrostatic burst test and showed that pipes up to 80% of wall loss defect could be repaired with composite patches and also showed that the hydrostatic burst test is a simple and accurate method to validate the FE model.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%