2010
DOI: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2010.03.008
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Performance of the CKD Epidemiology Collaboration (CKD-EPI) and the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) Study Equations in Healthy South Brazilians

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
18
0
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
3
18
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The results obtained using the MDRD equation confirm findings by multiple previous studies, because it has previously been observed that the MDRD equation significantly underestimates GFR among individuals with normal kidney function (1)(2)(3)(4)(5). A recent study in 96 healthy adults also found less underestimation of GFR with the CKD-EPI than the MDRD equation (18). Although including low-risk individuals in the cohort used to develop the CKD-EPI equation did attenuate underestimation of GFR in low-risk populations and improve specificity for detecting an mGFR Ͻ60 ml/min per 1.73 m 2 as compared with the MDRD equation, it did so at the expense of overestimating GFR when used in CKD patients and transplant recipients and reduced sensitivity for detecting an mGFR Ͻ60 ml/min per 1.73 m 2 .…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…The results obtained using the MDRD equation confirm findings by multiple previous studies, because it has previously been observed that the MDRD equation significantly underestimates GFR among individuals with normal kidney function (1)(2)(3)(4)(5). A recent study in 96 healthy adults also found less underestimation of GFR with the CKD-EPI than the MDRD equation (18). Although including low-risk individuals in the cohort used to develop the CKD-EPI equation did attenuate underestimation of GFR in low-risk populations and improve specificity for detecting an mGFR Ͻ60 ml/min per 1.73 m 2 as compared with the MDRD equation, it did so at the expense of overestimating GFR when used in CKD patients and transplant recipients and reduced sensitivity for detecting an mGFR Ͻ60 ml/min per 1.73 m 2 .…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…A subset of the diabetic patients [18] and the healthy volunteers [21] were previously examined in separated cohorts.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although not clearly validated to HIV-infected individuals, equations adjusting for muscle mass, age, weight, ethnicity and sex, provide a more sensitive estimation of the true renal function, and have been used in general population (eGFR)[11], [12]. Currently, the most common formulas to estimate the GFR are Modification of Diet in Renal Disease formula (MDRD) [13], [14], Cockcroft-Galt (CG) [14], [15] and Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration (CKD-epi) [16].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%