2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.snb.2005.01.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Performance of the Levenberg–Marquardt neural network training method in electronic nose applications

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
91
0
5

Year Published

2008
2008
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 217 publications
(96 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
91
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…ANNs are computational modeling tools that have been extensively used in many disciplines to model complex problems [21]. They have been applied to E-nose data for the purpose of classification [22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29]. The trained ANN can be employed for classification of fish freshness and the identification of the day after catching.…”
Section: Neural Network Classifiersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…ANNs are computational modeling tools that have been extensively used in many disciplines to model complex problems [21]. They have been applied to E-nose data for the purpose of classification [22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29]. The trained ANN can be employed for classification of fish freshness and the identification of the day after catching.…”
Section: Neural Network Classifiersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The e-nose does not recognize the individual odor-generating compounds, but rather provides an olfactory signature (fingerprint) of the analyzed air [10].…”
Section: Measurements and Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…create a preferential passage to the tourist area and to downtown by passing winds from West-South-West and South [10].…”
Section: Mobile E-nose Analysesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This objective is attained by gradually reducing the difference between the actual and expected outputs. In this paper, supervised learning was performed with the Levenberg-Marquardt algorithm (Levenberg, 1944;Marquardt, 1963), which had been successful in training feedforward networks in various fields of research (Adeloye & Munari, 2006;Fun & Hagan, 1996;Kermani, Schiffman, & Nagle, 2005;Übeyli, 2009). The mathematical details of the algorithm might not always be consistent with neurobiological findings of mechanisms occurring at the molecular level (Kandel, 2001).…”
Section: Training Cyclementioning
confidence: 99%