2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2020.117400
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Performance of the MAN ammonia monitoring network in the Netherlands

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…NO 2 and NH 3 were measured on a monthly basis using Palmes tubes ( Figure 3 b,c; [ 22 ]). Unlike the PM sensors, the Palmes tube method is well-known, widely used for monitoring purposes, and RIVM also uses these types of measurements in the National Air Quality Monitoring Network [ 25 ] and the Measuring Ammonia in Nature (MAN) network [ 26 , 27 ]. This means that these measurements provide a better indication of absolute values than the PM measurements.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…NO 2 and NH 3 were measured on a monthly basis using Palmes tubes ( Figure 3 b,c; [ 22 ]). Unlike the PM sensors, the Palmes tube method is well-known, widely used for monitoring purposes, and RIVM also uses these types of measurements in the National Air Quality Monitoring Network [ 25 ] and the Measuring Ammonia in Nature (MAN) network [ 26 , 27 ]. This means that these measurements provide a better indication of absolute values than the PM measurements.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…RIVM calibrated the data using the factors determined based on the comparison of Palmes tube measurements at official monitoring stations in the Netherlands with the official data recorded at these stations on a monthly basis. The 95% Confidence Interval (CI) uncertainty in the calibrated yearly average is in the order of 20–25% [ 25 , 27 ]. Calibration might not work as well for values of NH 3 over 20 µg/m 3 because the calibration is based on the values recorded at official stations, which are generally less than 20 µg/m 3 .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, ammonia wet deposition is measured at 10 sites (not shown), with two new measurement locations being currently in development (van Zanten et al, 2017;Wichink Kruit et al, 2021). In addition to the ammonia network at the LML stations, the Measuring Ammonia in Nature (MAN) network began operation in 2005 (Lolkema et al, 2015;Noordijk et al, 2020). The MAN network uses commercial passive samplers providing monthly average NH 3 concentrations at 255 locations in 86 Natura 2000 nature reserves and will be expanded with 10 new locations in rural areas and 9 new locations in urban areas (Wichink Kruit et al, 2021).…”
Section: The Challenge In Contextmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition to the German networks, the Measuring Ammonia in Nature (MAN) network monitors monthly mean values of NH 3 concentrations in Natura2000 areas in the Netherlands to detect the spatial pattern in concentration or to assess the influence of local sources (agriculture activities but also traffic) (https://man. rivm.nl/) (Lolkema et al, 2015;Noordijk et al, 2020). The network aims to be representative of different habitat types, NH 3 concentration levels, area size and shape, as well as the geographical distribution (Lolkema et al, 2015).…”
Section: In Situ Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We used in situ measurements of surface concentrations to validate the improvement in the emission products brought by the local adaptions. In the Netherlands, measurements from the Measuring Ammonia in Nature (MAN) network were used, including monthly mean values of ammonia concentrations at 255 sites in 60 Natura2000 to detect the spatial and temporal patterns in concentration to assess the influence of local sources on different habitat types and geographical distribution (https://man.rivm.nl/) (Lolkema et al, 2015;Noordijk et al, 2020). For Denmark, data from the Danish Background Air Quality Monitoring Program were used.…”
Section: Model Validationmentioning
confidence: 99%