2020
DOI: 10.1002/qre.2705
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Performance of the MEWMA‐CoDa control chart in the presence of measurement errors

Abstract: This paper can be considered as an extension of the work of Tran et al (for monitoring compositional data using a multivariate exponentially weighted moving average MEWMA-compositional data [CoDa] chart) by taking into account potential measurement errors that are known to highly affect production processes. A linearly covariate error model with a constant error variance is used to study the impact of measurement errors on the MEWMA-CoDa control chart. In particular, the influence of the device parameters (σ M… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
26
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

5
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
0
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…But if we use n > p, then it is also possible to monitor variability using the statistic defined in Gnanadesikan and Gupta (1970). (see, for instance, Zaidi et al (2020)).…”
Section: Linearly Covariate Measurement Errors Model For Codamentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…But if we use n > p, then it is also possible to monitor variability using the statistic defined in Gnanadesikan and Gupta (1970). (see, for instance, Zaidi et al (2020)).…”
Section: Linearly Covariate Measurement Errors Model For Codamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similar to Zaidi et al (2020), the following four cases for the CoDa variance-covariance matrix Σ * are considered,…”
Section: Performance Of the Mcusum-coda Control Chart In The Presence...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Note that the effect of measurement errors on the performance of HWMA scheme to monitor the process mean is discussed in Thanwane et al 18,19 for Cases K and U, respectively. For some early discussions on measurement errors in SPM context, see Linna and Woodall, 27 Maravelakis et al, 28 and Maravelakis 29 ; however, for some recent contributions, see Riaz et al, 30 Sabanho et al, 31,32 Zaidi et al, 33,34 Nguyen et al, 35 and Noor-ul-Amin et al 36 The objective of this paper is to incorporate FIR features in the time-varying control limits of the HWMA scheme to monitor the mean of processes with and without measurement errors so that its sensitivity in detecting start-up problems can be improved. In the review papers by Jensen et al, 37 Psarakis et al, 38 and Does et al, 4 it is stated that the estimation of the process parameters significantly degrades the performance of a monitoring scheme; thus, the investigation of the effect of parameter estimation on the performance of the HWMĀscheme for both a constant and linearly increasing measurement system error variances is conducted.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Note that the effect of measurement errors on the performance of HWMA scheme to monitor the process mean is discussed in Thanwane et al 18,19 for Cases K and U, respectively. For some early discussions on measurement errors in SPM context, see Linna and Woodall, 27 Maravelakis et al, 28 and Maravelakis 29 ; however, for some recent contributions, see Riaz et al, 30 Sabanho et al, 31,32 Zaidi et al, 33,34 Nguyen et al, 35 and Noor‐ul‐Amin et al 36 …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Next, Maravelakis et al (2004) and Maravelakis (2012) investigated the effect of measurement errors on the EWMA and CUSUM schemes, respectively; with the effect of a two-component measurement error on the EWMA scheme investigated in Abbasi (2016). For some recent discussions on measurement errors published after the review paper of Maleki et al (2017), see for instance Asif et al (2020), Cheng and Wang (2018), Nguyen et al (2019), Noor-ul-Amin et al (2020), Riaz et al (2019), Sabahno et al (2019, 2020), Salmasnia et al (2018), Shongwe et al (2020a, b, c), Tang et al (2019), Tran et al (2019a, b, c, 2020), Yeong et al (2017), Zaidi et al (2019, 2020).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%