1988
DOI: 10.1109/49.7827
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Performance of the multichannel multihop lightwave network under nonuniform traffic

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

1995
1995
2002
2002

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 52 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is seen, for example, that with N ‫ס‬ 1000, B ‫ס‬ 1 Gbps, and p ‫ס‬ 2, an aggregate network throughput of about 200 Gbps with each node supporting 200 Mbps of newly arriving traffic can be achieved. For nonuniform traffic, this capacity is reduced by a factor of between 0.3 and 0.5 depending on the routing algorithm used [96,103]. Notice that by using wavelength tunable transceivers, it is possible to rearrange the connectivity pattern without altering the physical topology of the network.…”
Section: Fig 22mentioning
confidence: 97%
“…It is seen, for example, that with N ‫ס‬ 1000, B ‫ס‬ 1 Gbps, and p ‫ס‬ 2, an aggregate network throughput of about 200 Gbps with each node supporting 200 Mbps of newly arriving traffic can be achieved. For nonuniform traffic, this capacity is reduced by a factor of between 0.3 and 0.5 depending on the routing algorithm used [96,103]. Notice that by using wavelength tunable transceivers, it is possible to rearrange the connectivity pattern without altering the physical topology of the network.…”
Section: Fig 22mentioning
confidence: 97%
“…From Table II, the worst case minimum number of hops between two arbitrary stations, is the smallest integer that satisfies the following inequality, whose left side is obtained by summing the numbers of new stations reached at each hop (from the rightmost column of Table II): (8) This reduces to which gives immediately Now, recalling that the number of wavebands is given by and that we report the expression for into and obtain (9) 8 The "01" term in the first row and last column of Table II would appear on a different row for a different originating station and a different value of W (i.e., T R ): But the "01" term always appears on the first row if the first or last station is the originator because of the self-loops on these stations in de Bruijn graphs.…”
Section: Performance Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the other extreme case (i.e., each waveband reduces to a single wavelength, yielding a fixed connection diagram. The performance of networks with regular connection diagrams has been studied for both uniform traffic [4]- [6] and nonuniform traffic [7], [8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…N=kj.i< and b=C.pk+r (4) There are many possible fixed routing algorithms for ShuffleNet. In this section, we present two that are particularly simple to implement.…”
Section: Fixed Routing Algorithm For Multi-dual Ring Connected Shufflmentioning
confidence: 99%