Performance of the South American Defense Council Under Autonomy Pressures

Abstract

This article evaluates the performance of the South American Defense Council, based on the rational institutional design and the concept of the operability of alliances. The trajectory of the Council between 2009 and 2018, is examined through a theoretical approximation inspired by neoclassical realism and by applying the descriptive inference method of process tracing. The results indicate that in almost a decade, the Defense Council of the Union of South American Nations did not achieve full operability according to its institutional design. The evidence suggests that aspirations of national autonomy undermined the regional security autonomy project. The article affirms that the presence of a South American security regionalism problem resulting from national and regional autonomy tensions generated a paradox of autonomy.

An Overview and Assessment of Performance of the Central American Presidential Summit

“…In this article, I argue that presidential summits in Central America are in crisis, as is the presidential‐driven model of regionalism as a whole. In the line of recent literature that assesses the performance of regional institutions or actors (Kennedy & Beaton, ; Mijares, ), this article affirms that the presidents have not acted as a regional driver because the summits have failed to become privileged spaces for socialization, agenda setting, and the coordination and legitimation of regional norms and practices. We assess the performance of the presidential summits, focusing on the two main concepts of regional political authority and rules compliance.…”

Autonomía militar y control civil sobre las fuerzas armadas sudamericanas en el siglo XXI

“…These initiatives contribute to regional stability in civil and military terms (Marcella, 2008). The South American Defense Council (cds), the Center for Strategic Defense Studies (ceed), and the South American Defense School (esude) aimed to build a regional defense identity and consolidate peace as a fundamental basis for the development and strengthening of defense cooperation (Briceño;Hoffmann, 2015;Mijares, 2018). The last years' face-to-face elections have transformed the region's political situation, generating a misalignment with the political proposals that created unasur, which caused its collapse (Rodrigues & Santos, 2020;Moussallem, 2021).…”

To lead or not to lead: regional powers and regional leadership

“…Reliance on regional leaders was a key feature of unipolarity (Huntigton 1999) which became even more pronounced as Washington's grand strategy switched from defensive to offensive dominance (Monteiro 2012). After 9-11 the U.S.A' focus on the Middle East and the fight against terrorism created space for more autonomous South American foreign policies and bolstered Brazilian leadership (Mijares 2018). Thus, despite some occasional skirmishes-e.g., harsh criticisms voiced during the Iraq War-Brazil was seen as a necessary partner to outsource leadership in the region, which is also reflected in the good relations between President Bush and President Lula.…”