2019
DOI: 10.1080/23311932.2019.1574109
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Performance of triticale varieties for the marginal highlands of Wag-Lasta, Ethiopia

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Table (8) shows means of planting dates the first date was superior to the second date with a significant difference and a mean of 40.22 gm, while it did not differ significantly from the third date that gave a mean of 39.30 gm they cause to environmental factors temperature and light period stages of plant growth that determine the size of flower and amount of increased or decreased final grain weight, this finding is consistent with [18], as they found differences between planting dates in a 1000-grain weight trait, as for genotypes results showed the superiority of FRAH genotype with a mean of 47.71 gm with a significant difference from some genotypes and taking MO-HAND genotype the lowest mean for this trait was 31.87 gm which did not differ with some other genotypes while the rest of genotypes were taken to differentiate between the highest and lowest mean the reason for increase and decrease is due to genetic factors of each composition on ability or inability of plants to provide growth rates for grain which leads to an increase or decrease in weight of grains this finding is consistent with [19], finding significant differences between genotypes of a weight 1000 of grain trait. As for the comparison of means of interactions between dates and genotypes, it showed the superiority of genotype POPP-CAAL at the first date with a mean of 58.07 gm a significant difference from all other interaction factors as for genotype MOHAND at the second date it gave the lowest mean of 23.85 gm the increase or decrease in weight of 1000 grain, had It is due to the appropriateness or inappropriateness of environmental factors from the temperature and light duration of different growth stages and extent of their influence on the accumulation of dry matter that is reflected in the weight of grains.…”
Section: Weight 1000 Grain Gmsupporting
confidence: 71%
“…Table (8) shows means of planting dates the first date was superior to the second date with a significant difference and a mean of 40.22 gm, while it did not differ significantly from the third date that gave a mean of 39.30 gm they cause to environmental factors temperature and light period stages of plant growth that determine the size of flower and amount of increased or decreased final grain weight, this finding is consistent with [18], as they found differences between planting dates in a 1000-grain weight trait, as for genotypes results showed the superiority of FRAH genotype with a mean of 47.71 gm with a significant difference from some genotypes and taking MO-HAND genotype the lowest mean for this trait was 31.87 gm which did not differ with some other genotypes while the rest of genotypes were taken to differentiate between the highest and lowest mean the reason for increase and decrease is due to genetic factors of each composition on ability or inability of plants to provide growth rates for grain which leads to an increase or decrease in weight of grains this finding is consistent with [19], finding significant differences between genotypes of a weight 1000 of grain trait. As for the comparison of means of interactions between dates and genotypes, it showed the superiority of genotype POPP-CAAL at the first date with a mean of 58.07 gm a significant difference from all other interaction factors as for genotype MOHAND at the second date it gave the lowest mean of 23.85 gm the increase or decrease in weight of 1000 grain, had It is due to the appropriateness or inappropriateness of environmental factors from the temperature and light duration of different growth stages and extent of their influence on the accumulation of dry matter that is reflected in the weight of grains.…”
Section: Weight 1000 Grain Gmsupporting
confidence: 71%
“…of Days from 50% Anthesis to Physiological maturity was observed in line 827 which is in line with a result of a study in which observed that optimum No. of Days from 50% Anthesis to Physiological maturity of triticale is 42 days (Bezabih, Girmay, & Lakewu, 2019). No.…”
Section: Agronomic Charactersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By distant hybridization, the crop species triticale (× Triticosecale Wittmack) was created, and highly productive commercial varieties for various purposes were obtained 3 . Triticale is an alternative crop for areas characterized by low soil fertility as well as uneven and late rainfall 4 . However, the implementation of sustainable farming is impossible without obtaining new varieties of triticale that meet the requirements of modern farming 5 , 6 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%