2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.solener.2008.06.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Performance of water-in-glass evacuated tube solar water heaters

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
65
0
3

Year Published

2012
2012
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 218 publications
(71 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
3
65
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…They are already widely used in domestic solar hot water systems, 36,37 and allow evacuated solar hot water tubes to be heated to over 100°C under stagnation conditions. 38 use thermal insulation on both top and bottom surfaces of the absorber to reduce convective loss to air as well as conductive and radiative heat losses to the water underneath. Finally, to overcome the mismatch between the latent heat of vaporization and the ambient solar flux, we use thermal concentration, by conducting the absorbed heat into the evaporation area, which is smaller than the absorber surface area.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They are already widely used in domestic solar hot water systems, 36,37 and allow evacuated solar hot water tubes to be heated to over 100°C under stagnation conditions. 38 use thermal insulation on both top and bottom surfaces of the absorber to reduce convective loss to air as well as conductive and radiative heat losses to the water underneath. Finally, to overcome the mismatch between the latent heat of vaporization and the ambient solar flux, we use thermal concentration, by conducting the absorbed heat into the evaporation area, which is smaller than the absorber surface area.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Of the literature reviewed, this approach is most It is expected that the efficiency of the vertical collector will be greater than that of the control during the winter months due to more direct incident solar radiation. This may be supported by the findings of Budihardjo and Morrison (2009), who although they did not test a vertical panel, found that as the inclination of the collector was increased to 45°, the annual savings during the winter months was 12% higher than when the collector was mounted at 22°. …”
Section: Collector 2 At 50º To Horizontal Intermediate Flow Rate (Comentioning
confidence: 77%
“…For example, one of the most common types of evacuated tube is hollow, and is referred to as a water-in glass type. Budihardjo and Morrison (2009) evaluate the performance of water-in-glass type evacuated tube solar water heaters. The performance of this system was compared to flat plate collectors and was found to be lower than a typical two-panel flat plate collector.…”
Section: Evacuated Tubesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Budihardjo et al 16 showed that heat loss coefficient varies with tube quality. For good quality tubes, the heat loss coefficient varies from 0.5 W/m 2 K (at T m 2 T a = 25°C) to 0.65 W/ m 2 K (at T m 2 T a = 65°C).…”
Section: F Rmentioning
confidence: 99%