2016
DOI: 10.1117/12.2241067
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Performance of wavefront-sensorless adaptive optics using modal and zonal correction

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Indirect wavefront sensing techniques have gained more scientific attention in the field of FSOC [13][14][15], mainly due to improvements associated with fast DMs, parallel processing, and efficient blind search algorithms [15]. These sensor-less techniques iteratively optimize the received power, updating the AO phase compensation system based on the analysis of a performance metric, which is generally power in the bucket.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Indirect wavefront sensing techniques have gained more scientific attention in the field of FSOC [13][14][15], mainly due to improvements associated with fast DMs, parallel processing, and efficient blind search algorithms [15]. These sensor-less techniques iteratively optimize the received power, updating the AO phase compensation system based on the analysis of a performance metric, which is generally power in the bucket.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Two different blind search approaches are usually considered. The zonal approach randomly changes the states of single DM actuators in searching for optimal power coupling; the modal approach shapes all actuators at once, following an orthogonal modal basis (e.g., Zernike polynomials) [15]. In general, indirect phase sensing benefits from simple optical setups, high power efficiency, and robustness against power scintillation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Real-time systems, like those based on Shack-Hartmann wave-front sensor, are very efficient as long as the turbulence is weak-to-moderate [1]. For stronger turbulence conditions, scintillation and phase singularities limit its performance, and the wave-front correction may be better faced with iterative systems [2].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Overall, the available time for a phase wave-front correction can be rounded to 1 milliseconds [3,4]. Considering that existing iterative solutions need more than 100 iterations to converge to an optimum, we would require unpractical loop bandwidths on the order of 100 kHz [2,5]. An alternative is a hybrid system which combines real-time wavefront sensors to provide a system hot start, effectively reducing the number of iterations [6].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%