2000
DOI: 10.1016/s0160-2896(00)00035-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Performance on Raven's Matrices by African and White University Students in South Africa

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

4
53
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 64 publications
(57 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
4
53
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The g factor accounted for the greatest amount of variance in all groups, and its loadings differed little by ethnicity. Thus, the factor structure of cognitive ability is nearly identical for Blacks and for Whites, as was found in the studies by Owen (1992) and Rushton and Skuy (2000;Rushton et al, 2002 comparing Africans, East Indians, and Whites on the item structures of tests described in Section 3. There was no "Factor X" specific to race.…”
Section: Section 2: the Two Conflicting Research Programssupporting
confidence: 62%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The g factor accounted for the greatest amount of variance in all groups, and its loadings differed little by ethnicity. Thus, the factor structure of cognitive ability is nearly identical for Blacks and for Whites, as was found in the studies by Owen (1992) and Rushton and Skuy (2000;Rushton et al, 2002 comparing Africans, East Indians, and Whites on the item structures of tests described in Section 3. There was no "Factor X" specific to race.…”
Section: Section 2: the Two Conflicting Research Programssupporting
confidence: 62%
“…This hypothesis of internal bias has been tested. The psychometric studies by Owen (1992) on thousands of high school students, and by Rushton and Skuy (2000;Rushton et al, 2002 on hundreds of university students, found almost identical item structures in Africans, Whites, and East Indians on the Progressive Matrices. Items found difficult by one group were difficult for the others; items found easy by one group were easy for the others (mean rs ϭ .90, p Ͻ .001).…”
Section: Section 2: the Two Conflicting Research Programsmentioning
confidence: 96%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As suggested by Rushton and coauthors (e.g., Rushton, Bons, Vernon, & Cvorovic, 2007;Rushton, Skuy, 2000;Rushton, Skuy, & Fridjohn, 2003), group differences in IQ can be better described on the basis of an analysis at item level. Despite the fact that it may be open to criticisms (for a debate see Rushton and Jensen, 2010;Wicherts and Johnson, 2009) the method can offer further information useful in the present context.…”
Section: Mt-advanced Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Te Nijenhuis et al describe how Rushton tested Spearman's hypothesis in a series of studies at the item level using the various versions of Raven's Progressive Matrices (RPM) in Africa and in Serbia [11][12][13][14][15]. The g loadings of items were operationalized as the items' correlation with the total score on the RPM, which has a strong correlation with the general factor of intelligence.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%