2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.bir.2016.05.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Performance persistence in institutional investment management: The case of Chinese equity funds

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Second, mutual funds in the U.S.A are corporate entities with a specific board of directors (or trustees) overseeing each fund. In contrast, mutual funds in China are not corporate entities but contract funds, implying fewer voting rights are provided to investors (Rao et al, 2016).…”
Section: Characteristics Of Mutual Fundsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Second, mutual funds in the U.S.A are corporate entities with a specific board of directors (or trustees) overseeing each fund. In contrast, mutual funds in China are not corporate entities but contract funds, implying fewer voting rights are provided to investors (Rao et al, 2016).…”
Section: Characteristics Of Mutual Fundsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Distinctly management fees in China's mutual funds are fixed at 1.5% of total assets under management since 2002. Subsequently, management fees do not reveal much about the mutual funds' performance in China (Rao et al, 2016).…”
Section: Characteristics Of Mutual Fundsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation