2016
DOI: 10.1109/taes.2015.140717
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Performance prediction of quantized SAR ATR algorithms

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…, andp q,i is the scalar notation of the p i utilized in (5). By substituting a realized quantile, q r at pixel i, the penalty associated with a given realization of the class-conditional distribution at that pixel, t i , is realized.…”
Section: Mpm Test Statistic and Classification Decisionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…, andp q,i is the scalar notation of the p i utilized in (5). By substituting a realized quantile, q r at pixel i, the penalty associated with a given realization of the class-conditional distribution at that pixel, t i , is realized.…”
Section: Mpm Test Statistic and Classification Decisionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the case that the parameters of these class-conditional DM distributions can be written as an explicit function of an operating condition of interest, the performance can be approximated as a direct function of the operating condition. 5 Often an explicit parametrization is intractable and a more general approach can be used utilizing class-conditional parametrizations that vary as an implicit function of operating condition. Therefore, by training in-class templates as an operating condition is varied, we can predict the performance at each discrete setting, effectively sampling the performance curve.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%