2019
DOI: 10.1159/000503095
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Performance Status Assessment by Using ECOG (Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group) Score for Cancer Patients by Oncology Healthcare Professionals

Abstract: Medical literature does not have clear consensus on inter-rater reliability of PS assessment by different oncology health care professionals (HCPs) although it plays an important role in treatment decision and prognosis for oncology patients. Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) and Karnofsky performance status (KPS) scores are commonly used for this purpose by oncology HCPs around the world. This study was conducted to find variability or similarities in assessment of PS among the different oncology HCPs… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
149
0
5

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 201 publications
(155 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
1
149
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…A review of the literature reflects the lack of unified general criteria and norms for assessing the quality of life in NHL patients. Regardless of the stage of the disease and the histological type of NHL, an impaired performance status is a major obstacle, which contraindicates chemotherapy or limits the application of specific treatment in the required volume, which negatively influences the patient's quality of life 9,22,23 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A review of the literature reflects the lack of unified general criteria and norms for assessing the quality of life in NHL patients. Regardless of the stage of the disease and the histological type of NHL, an impaired performance status is a major obstacle, which contraindicates chemotherapy or limits the application of specific treatment in the required volume, which negatively influences the patient's quality of life 9,22,23 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The tools applied to the study of quality of life are profiles and questionnaires that allow the evaluation of each component of quality of life separately involving a specific assessment of a phenomenon 8 . Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status is used by oncologists to assess patients' degree of independence in cytostatic therapy and to predict the prognosis in malignancies with a high degree of spread 9 . The European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) QLQ-C30 questionnaire is one of the most widely used questionnaires in the last 30 years in researching the quality of life of patients with oncological diseases (2010 evaluation report of the QLG Scientific Committee) 10 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Performance status was measured using the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group score [ 19 ] as follows; Grade 0—fully active with no physical restrictions; Grade 1—some physical restriction but able to carry out light work; Grade 2—ambulatory and capable of self-care but unable to carry out any work activity. Confined to bed or wheelchair less than 50% of waking hours; Grade 3—capable of only limited self-care.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A total of consecutive 39 patients (age, 47–75 years; 26 male patients and 13 female patients) with advanced NSCLC, who underwent apatinib plus docetaxel treatment or docetaxel alone treatment, were retrospectively enrolled in The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University between January 2017 and December 2018. The inclusion criteria were as follows: i) Diagnosed with primary NSCLC at stage IV or recurrent metastatic NSCLC refractory/intolerant to standard therapy; ii) age ≥18 years; iii) a baseline Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status score of 0–1 ( 13 ); iv) adequate hematologic, hepatic and renal functions; v) cessation of other anti-tumor therapies for ≥1 month prior to enrollment; vi) presence of ≥1 measurable lesion defined by Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors version 1.1 (RECIST 1.1) ( 14 ); and vii) a survival prognosis of >3 months. Furthermore, the exclusion criteria were as follows: i) Previously treated with immunotherapy; ii) untreated metastases of the central nervous system; iii) uncontrolled blood pressure with medication (>140/90 mmHg); iv) serious infection or autoimmune disease; v) bleeding tendency; and vi) hepatopathy, nephropathy, cardiopathy, respiratory disease or uncontrollable diabetes.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%