2009
DOI: 10.1080/19346182.2009.9648493
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Performance versus moment of inertia of sporting implements

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
16
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
1
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, it makes sense physically that the single parameter of a bat that determines its performance is the BBCOR, a conclusion strongly supported by the present data. Although this result had been anticipated previously on theoretical grounds [11], to our knowledge the present analysis of the batting cage data provides the first experimental confirmation. The strong correlation between batted ball speed and e has led the NCAA to adopt the BBCOR as their primary metric of performance [12].…”
Section: Bat Performance Analysissupporting
confidence: 71%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Therefore, it makes sense physically that the single parameter of a bat that determines its performance is the BBCOR, a conclusion strongly supported by the present data. Although this result had been anticipated previously on theoretical grounds [11], to our knowledge the present analysis of the batting cage data provides the first experimental confirmation. The strong correlation between batted ball speed and e has led the NCAA to adopt the BBCOR as their primary metric of performance [12].…”
Section: Bat Performance Analysissupporting
confidence: 71%
“…For the bats in Table 1, the fraction ranges from 1.6 to 1.7. Indeed, I 15 is often referred to as the ''swing weight'' of a bat [11]. Therefore, the only two distinguishing characteristics of a bat that determine its performance are the BBCOR and the swing weight.…”
Section: Bat Performance Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on the Rayleigh-Ritz method, a model of the handgripped racket was developed to predict how the player's grip force affects the dynamic behaviour of the racket. According to Cross and Nathan (2009), despite its non-uniform shape, a tennis racket has an approximately uniform mass distribution along its central axis, and behaves similarly to a uniform beam. Therefore, the racket was modelled as a uniform beam of equivalent mass m r ¼ ρSL, equivalent moment of inertia about its central axis through its centre of mass…”
Section: Hand-gripped Racket Modellingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Frame stiffness has been shown to have virtually no effect for impacts at or close to the node, as the fundamental mode is not excited [33,59,[72][73][74]. Stiffer rackets experience lower energy losses for impacts away from the node, particularly near the tip and in the throat region where effective mass is greatest [33,59,72]. Modern frame technology is beneficial for the recreational player as the penalty for hitting away from the centre of the racket is reduced.…”
Section: Frame Stiffnessmentioning
confidence: 99%