2022 International Symposium on Electronics and Telecommunications (ISETC) 2022
DOI: 10.1109/isetc56213.2022.10010114
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Performances Analysis of Turbo Codes, LDPC Codes and Polar Codes using AWGN channel with and without Inter Symbol Interference

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

2
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…LDPC codes offer advantages over traditional Reed-Solomon (RS) codes and convolutional codes due to their simpler coding structure and lower decoding complexity [9]. Compared with Turbo code, LDPC code is proven to have stronger error correction capability and lower error rate in long coding, and the iterative decoding algorithm of LDPC is a parallel algorithm with low decoding delay [10,11]. Moreover, LDPC codes have shown better performance relative to polar codes in optical communication systems, especially under high SNR conditions, where LDPC codes generally have lower bit error rates and higher reliability [12].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…LDPC codes offer advantages over traditional Reed-Solomon (RS) codes and convolutional codes due to their simpler coding structure and lower decoding complexity [9]. Compared with Turbo code, LDPC code is proven to have stronger error correction capability and lower error rate in long coding, and the iterative decoding algorithm of LDPC is a parallel algorithm with low decoding delay [10,11]. Moreover, LDPC codes have shown better performance relative to polar codes in optical communication systems, especially under high SNR conditions, where LDPC codes generally have lower bit error rates and higher reliability [12].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several criteria for optimizing these coefficients are recommended; the most used being that of minimizing the mean square error (MMSE). Although an MMSE equalizer provides a good performance, a simple approach to designing a zero forcing equalizer at the level of the receiver was considered in [ 12 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The current work is a continuation of the previous papers in which a performance comparison was made between the zero forcing (ZF) or MMSE equalization preceded the decoding process using different codes [13,14], intending to evaluate the performance of the equalization that takes place inside the decoding process as in the case of turbo equalization. In this respect, the contributions of this article can be summarized as follows:…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%