2018
DOI: 10.3390/fermentation4030061
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Performances of Different Metabolic Lactobacillus Groups During the Fermentation of Pizza Doughs Processed from Semolina

Abstract: The main hypothesis of this work is that facultative and obligate heterofermentative Lactobacillus species can differently impact the final characteristics of pizza. The objective was to evaluate separately the behavior of the facultative heterofermentative species (FHS), such as Lactobacillus sanfranciscensis, Lactobacillu brevis, and Lactobacillus rossiae, and to obligate the heterofermentative species (OHS), including Lactobacillus plantarum, Lactobacillus graminis, and Lactobacillus curvatus, in the sourdo… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
3
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
2
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As matter of fact, flour is finer than semolina (Posner, 2000), thus, the differences in particle size between the two products indicate a different contact surface for the fermenting microorganisms with a consequent less utilization of carbohydrates and a final pH of semolina doughs higher than those registered for flour doughs. Similar behaviours were observed when the fermentation was operated by lactic acid bacteria rather than yeasts (Gaglio et al, 2018;Francesca et al, 2019). The decrease of pH was correlated to the increase of TTA in all doughs.…”
Section: Fermentation Processsupporting
confidence: 74%
“…As matter of fact, flour is finer than semolina (Posner, 2000), thus, the differences in particle size between the two products indicate a different contact surface for the fermenting microorganisms with a consequent less utilization of carbohydrates and a final pH of semolina doughs higher than those registered for flour doughs. Similar behaviours were observed when the fermentation was operated by lactic acid bacteria rather than yeasts (Gaglio et al, 2018;Francesca et al, 2019). The decrease of pH was correlated to the increase of TTA in all doughs.…”
Section: Fermentation Processsupporting
confidence: 74%
“…In addition, according to the chemical flours profile, SFOH has a greater amount of galactose, arabinose, and uronic acids than CONV, which could promote the growth of these bacteria, as described in the literature [21,22]. The results are according to the literature, given the recognized metabolic diversity of Lactobacillus, as previous results also reported strain-specific effects of tomato flours [23,24]. Thus, these flours can also be used as a medium for probiotic growth.…”
Section: Probiotic Effectsupporting
confidence: 58%
“…The hydration of a sourdough starter and any subsequent sourdough bread products will closely influence the flow of the sourdough bread system, which can ultimately affect the structural and textural quality of final bread products ( Jahromi et al, 2014 ). The impact of microbial ecology on the rheology of sourdough and final bread quality is of emerging interest because there is evidence that sourdough fermentation improves the elasticity, viscosity, and extensibility of dough compared to dough leavened primarily with baker’s yeast ( Clarke et al, 2004 ; Häggman & Salovaara, 2008b ; Gänzle, Loponen & Gobbetti, 2008 ; Bender et al, 2018 ; Gaglio et al, 2018 ; Yildirim-Mavis et al, 2019 ). Like the sensory research described in section 4.1, most rheological research to date involves the use of laboratory inoculated starters.…”
Section: Calls For Future Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Compared to Type I starters, Type II starters are usually fermented at higher temperatures for a quicker build, favoring bacterial organic acid production and ultimately resulting in a lower pH system ( De Vuyst & Neysens, 2005 ; De Vuyst, Van Kerrebroeck & Leroy, 2017 ; Siepmann et al, 2019 ). While Type II starters are easier to use at large scales of production because of their consistency, they impart specific flavor profiles and can produce a different crumb texture or structure, or loaf volume ( Guerzoni et al, 2007 ; Sterr, Weiss & Schmidt, 2009 ; Bender et al, 2018 ; Gaglio et al, 2018 ). Expanding on the analogy of trees in plantations, specific bacteria are added to Type II starters to achieve unique (i.e., extra sour) organoleptic properties and enhanced shelf life ( Gänzle & Zheng, 2019 ), because ultimately the dough will be supplemented with bakers’ yeast (or any other yeast which is acid-tolerant and an extreme CO 2 producer) to ensure a full, adequate rise.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%