2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.desal.2020.114504
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Performances of novel chelating ion exchange resins for boron and arsenic removal from saline geothermal water using adsorption-membrane filtration hybrid process

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
22
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 83 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…An example is an adsorption-membrane filtration hybrid process where ion exchange resins are coupled with membrane filtration for water purification [101,102]. Cermikil et al [103] investigated the performance of NMDG-functionalized boron-selective ion exchange resins against the commercial boron-selective Dowex XUS 43594 resin. In contrast to the boron removal capacity of Dowex XUS 43594, which is 0.52 mg/L with 95.3% efficiency, the NMDG-functionalized resin yielded 1 mg B/L after 60 min with a boron removal rate of 92%.…”
Section: Hybrid Processesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An example is an adsorption-membrane filtration hybrid process where ion exchange resins are coupled with membrane filtration for water purification [101,102]. Cermikil et al [103] investigated the performance of NMDG-functionalized boron-selective ion exchange resins against the commercial boron-selective Dowex XUS 43594 resin. In contrast to the boron removal capacity of Dowex XUS 43594, which is 0.52 mg/L with 95.3% efficiency, the NMDG-functionalized resin yielded 1 mg B/L after 60 min with a boron removal rate of 92%.…”
Section: Hybrid Processesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Organic As species including dimethyl arsenic acid, monomethylarsonic acid and arsenobetaine are about 70 times less toxic than inorganic As species [5]. Various processes have been studied to remove As from contaminated water, including nanofiltration [6], electrochemical techniques [7], chemical precipitation [8], ion exchange [9], and membrane separation [10]. Production of excess sludge, high cost and energy requirement, incomplete removal of pollutants, high chemical requirements and high costs of operation and maintenance are disadvantages of previous methods [11].…”
Section: Contamination Of Water Resources With Arsenic (As) Is a Major Environmental Threat Becausementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Organic As species including dimethyl arsenic acid, monomethylarsonic acid and arsenobetaine are about 70 times less toxic than inorganic As species 5 . Various processes have been studied to remove As from contaminated water, including nanofiltration 6 , electrochemical techniques 7 , chemical precipitation 8 , ion exchange 9 , and membrane separation 10 . Production of excess sludge, high cost and energy requirement, incomplete removal of pollutants, high chemical requirements and high costs of operation and maintenance are disadvantages of previous methods 11 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%