2021
DOI: 10.1007/s00449-021-02557-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Performances of simultaneous enhanced removal of nitrogen and phosphorus via biological aerated filter with biochar as fillers under low dissolved oxygen for digested swine wastewater treatment

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 60 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…RBG‐13‐54‐9 , SC‐I‐84 , Candidatus Udaeobater , KD4‐96 , Subgroup‐6 , Rhodanobacter , Gemmatimonas , Subgroup‐7 , Sva0485 and MBNT15 were the dominant genus in each treatment, their relative abundances were all greater than 1%. Previous studies found that RBG‐13‐54‐9 was the dominant strain for denitrification (Xin et al, 2021). Compared with CK treatment (4.6%), the relative abundance of RBG‐13‐54‐9 was significantly reduced in C treatment (3.9%) ( p < 0.05), which may be the reason for the lower total nitrogen loss in C treatment.…”
Section: Results and Analysismentioning
confidence: 91%
“…RBG‐13‐54‐9 , SC‐I‐84 , Candidatus Udaeobater , KD4‐96 , Subgroup‐6 , Rhodanobacter , Gemmatimonas , Subgroup‐7 , Sva0485 and MBNT15 were the dominant genus in each treatment, their relative abundances were all greater than 1%. Previous studies found that RBG‐13‐54‐9 was the dominant strain for denitrification (Xin et al, 2021). Compared with CK treatment (4.6%), the relative abundance of RBG‐13‐54‐9 was significantly reduced in C treatment (3.9%) ( p < 0.05), which may be the reason for the lower total nitrogen loss in C treatment.…”
Section: Results and Analysismentioning
confidence: 91%
“…At 85 kPa, the addition of organic matter had a negligible impact on Rhodanobacter abundance, whereas at 70 kPa, a significant increase was observed, confirming organic matter's stimulating effect on denitrification. Additionally, Chujaibacter, a well-known denitrifying bacterium [27], thrived under reduced pressure. Its abundance rose from less than 3% in S1 and S3 to 24.6% in S2 and 17.5% in S4 as the reactor pressure decreased, reinforcing the idea that decreased pressure accelerated nitrogen escape and bolstered the denitrification process.…”
Section: Variation Of Microbial Diversitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Certain bacterial genera, such as Micropepsacaea, Acidovorax, Stenotrophomonas, Nitrosomonas, and Nitrospira, are known for their denitrification and nitrification capabilities [27,28]. The abundance of these bacteria either decreased or remained relatively stable with a decreasing air pressure and the introduction of COD.…”
Section: Variation Of Microbial Diversitymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The increase in Comamonadaceae levels in the aerobic zone of the piggery's wastewater treatment system observed in this study confirmed this conclusion. Wang et al and Xin et al used metagenomic studies to show that Rhodophyta plays a leading role in denitrification in wastewater treatment systems [40,41]; different genera of Rhodocyclaceae have special treatment functions. For example, the studies of McIlroy et al and Li et al showed that Rhodocyclaceae appears alternately in the enhanced biological phosphorus removal (EBPR) bioreactor under anaerobic and aerobic conditions to enhance the phosphorus removal effect [42,43].…”
Section: Bacterial Community Structure Among the Biological Treatment Systemsmentioning
confidence: 99%