Performative Apparatus and Diffractive Practices: An Account of Artificial Life Art

Abstract

Drawing on our own art/science practices and a series of interviews with artificial life practitioners, we explore the entanglement of developments at the artistic edges of artificial life. We start by defining key terms from Karen Baradʼs agential realism. We then diffractively read artificial life together with agential realism to discuss the potential for interventions in the field. Through a discussion of artificial life computer simulations, ideas of agency are problematized, and artificial lifeʼs single purposeful actor, the agent, is replaced by agential, an adjective denoting a relationship rather than a subject-object duality. We then seek to reinterpret the difficult-to-define term "emergence." Agency in artificial life emerges through what Barad calls entanglement, in this case between observers and their apparatus, a perpetual engagement between observations of a system and their interpretations. The article explores the differences that this diffractive perspective makes to artificial life and accounts of its materialization.

Addressing the imagination gap through STEAMM+D and indigenous knowledge

“…Using collaborative methods drawn from participatory design, the project proceeded through a series of workshops, intensive residencies, and presentations. It led to Theise's breakthrough discovery of stem cell plasticity and served Prophet's interest in Artificial Life, complexity theory, and aesthetics, effectively demonstrating relationships between previously invisible phenomena (14). Theise's (15) collaboration with Prophet ignited his now-enduring focus on "complexity theory applications to cell biology, formulations of a post-modern biology, and mind-body medicine."…”

Foundations of ArtScience: Formulating the Problem

“…Sims' "artistic" work is actually very similar to the one done in the "scientific" discipline of artificial life (Langton, 1997;Maes, 1995;Prophet & Pritchard, 2015). Here too, researchers make simulations that illustrate how virtual creatures that resemble living organisms in their behavior and properties can self-organize and evolve in virtual ecosystems.…”

Engaging with theoretical diffraction in teacher education

“…Diffraction is a concept not commonly used when discussing interaction between an educator and a student. It is more often introduced as an alternative methodology to for example critical reflection (taken up in educational research by for example Davies 2014, Lenz-Taguchi & Palmer 2013, Mazzei 2014, Seghal 2014, Taylor & Blaise 2014, Prophet & Pritchard 2015. Whereas reflection and reflexivity might document categories of difference, diffraction is itself the process whereby a difference is made and made to matter (Davies 2014, p.734).…”