2019
DOI: 10.1177/0038026119895219
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Performing ambiguous policy: How innovation events simultaneously perform change and collaborative order

Abstract: The aim of this article is to analyse how innovation policy is staged and legitimised through the dramatised social process of an event. The context is taken from an annual event, Skåne Innovation Week, which is arranged by the regional innovation system in Skåne, Sweden. Innovation systems often organise similar events internationally, which appear to play a key role in performing inter-organisational collaboration between actors from the public sector, industry and research, as well as manifesting belief in … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 29 publications
(30 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Similarly, innovationism is manifested in a torrent of workshops, conferences, and other events where entrepreneurs, academics, elected officials, and public servants meet and mingle under visionary slogans and imaginative rhetoric. The purpose is clearly not to innovate, but to breed and manifest "a form of collective endorsement of belief" in innovation (Andersson Cederholm andHall 2020, p. 1416) and build a collective identity around it (Valaskivi 2012, p. 150;Hall and Löfgren 2017, p. 314).…”
Section: Innovationismmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similarly, innovationism is manifested in a torrent of workshops, conferences, and other events where entrepreneurs, academics, elected officials, and public servants meet and mingle under visionary slogans and imaginative rhetoric. The purpose is clearly not to innovate, but to breed and manifest "a form of collective endorsement of belief" in innovation (Andersson Cederholm andHall 2020, p. 1416) and build a collective identity around it (Valaskivi 2012, p. 150;Hall and Löfgren 2017, p. 314).…”
Section: Innovationismmentioning
confidence: 99%