How does diplomacy recognise the political identity of international actors? Drawing on critical approaches, this article analyses the development of identities in diplomatic communications concerning the Western Sahara conflict from the early 2000s to the present. It argues that a failure to question relationships between identities as projected in diplomatic sources and those of global threats like
IntroductionName-calling has a role in contemporary diplomacy. Moroccan governments and Sahrawi independence movement Frente Popular de Liberación de Saguía el Hamra y Río de Oro (POLISARIO) call each other "Communists", "terrorists", and "imperialists" at every available opportunity. Linking POLISARIO to global identities like Communism or Islamic terrorism through diplomacy achieves far more than insult. These identities globalise the conflict, for antiimperialism, Communism and Islamic terrorism have defined the widest international struggles since the end of WWII. Such name-calling, it is argued, releases agency for actors to pursue policies that might otherwise appear less acceptable to allies and the international community. This is the case with POLISARIO, whose identity was subsumed into the global binary of the Cold War from the beginning of the conflict in 1975, and subsequently to also being a facilitator of Islamic terrorism in the 2000s. This represents a staggering success of Moroccan diplomacy: the alignment of Moroccan and POLISARIO identities with the latest dominant global security concerns, contributing to securing significant US and French support for Moroccan occupation and administration of the Western Sahara non-self-governing territory.This article analyses diplomatic communication in the Western Sahara conflict to explore how diplomatic communication about political identity enabled Morocco to pursue policy outcomes from the early 2000s to the present. POLISARIO defines itself as a defender of the Sahrawi nation that seeks self-determination and recognition of the Sahrawi Arab Democratic Republic (SADR). POLISARIO highlights the plight of over 100,000 Sahrawi refugees in camps at Tindouf awaiting self-determination since the desert exodus of 1975, whilst accusing Morocco of imperialism. Morocco claims sovereignty over what it considers its southern provinces. As part of this claim it defines POLISARIO as a Cold War hangover; a Communist dictatorship controlled by Algeria's geopolitical interests, implicated in crime, smuggling, and Islamic terrorism -in contrast to Moroccan democracy and human rights. POLISARIO stands accused of being simultaneously Communist and Islamic fundamentalist, holding a dictatorial grip on the Tindouf camps and facilitating lawlessness. Notably, similar contradictory narratives thrived in 2003 about Iraq and the "Axis of Evil". A British journalist opined that 'attempts to tar POLISARIO with the Al Qaeda brush have been as cack-handed as the previous depictions of POLISARIO fighters as being, variously, Cuban mercenaries, Iranian-backed revolutionaries and...