2017
DOI: 10.1186/s40560-017-0220-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Perfusion indices revisited

Abstract: Monitoring of tissue perfusion is an essential step in the management of acute circulatory failure. The presence of cellular dysfunction has been a basic component of shock definition even in the absence of hypotension. Monitoring of tissue perfusion includes biomarkers of global tissue perfusion and measures for assessment of perfusion in non-vital organs.The presence of poor tissue perfusion in a shocked patient is usually associated with worse outcome. Persistently impaired perfusion despite adequate resusc… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

2
94
1
6

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 105 publications
(103 citation statements)
references
References 71 publications
2
94
1
6
Order By: Relevance
“…Also, there could be multiple pathophysiological factors, e.g., arterial or venous occlusion, peripheral arterial disease, circulatory shock, or melanoma that can cause changes in peripheral perfusion. To disambiguate these diverse factors of blood perfusion variations using only one-dimensional temporal information of perfusion obtained using a contact-based sensor such as NIRS or a PulseOx or an LDF sensor is challenging, and therefore these point modalities are generally used only as a trend monitoring tool 9,44 in clinical practice. Instead, PulseCam provides high dimensional spatial and temporal blood perfusion information, and thus potentially opens up the opportunity to combine and collate both spatial as well as temporal dependence to disambiguate diverse factors of blood perfusion variations.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Also, there could be multiple pathophysiological factors, e.g., arterial or venous occlusion, peripheral arterial disease, circulatory shock, or melanoma that can cause changes in peripheral perfusion. To disambiguate these diverse factors of blood perfusion variations using only one-dimensional temporal information of perfusion obtained using a contact-based sensor such as NIRS or a PulseOx or an LDF sensor is challenging, and therefore these point modalities are generally used only as a trend monitoring tool 9,44 in clinical practice. Instead, PulseCam provides high dimensional spatial and temporal blood perfusion information, and thus potentially opens up the opportunity to combine and collate both spatial as well as temporal dependence to disambiguate diverse factors of blood perfusion variations.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Popular clinical markers of local or peripheral perfusion such as center-to-toe temperature difference, skin mottling and capillary refill time are subjective indicators that lack the required sensitivity and specificity to identify patients with compromised peripheral perfusion 9 . In the last few decades, non-invasive contact-based optical techniques have increasingly been adopted in clinical settings for quantitative and qualitative assessment of blood perfusion in peripheral tissue.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…pulse pressure [10, 11] and stroke volume [12, 13] variations – both indicators of fluid responsiveness, have been promoted. The currently available options for volume assessment include capillary refill, peripheral temperature, skin color, mean arterial pressure, urine output, creatinine, lactate, lung sounds, chest X ray, edema, weight changes, central venous oxygen saturation, and cardiac output monitoring [9, 14-17]. All of these parameters are surrogate markers of the adequacy of the circulating blood volume (BV) [14, 15].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The currently available options for volume assessment include capillary refill, peripheral temperature, skin color, mean arterial pressure, urine output, creatinine, lactate, lung sounds, chest X ray, edema, weight changes, central venous oxygen saturation, and cardiac output monitoring [9, 14-17]. All of these parameters are surrogate markers of the adequacy of the circulating blood volume (BV) [14, 15]. Ultimately, the decision to administer or remove volume is almost always predicated on an assessment of volume status in the absence of a direct measurement .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The serum lactate level is considered a surrogate of tissue perfusion because the lactate level increases in states of low peripheral perfusion. [16] Although the SV and CO can be measured intraoperatively with several devices such as esophageal Doppler or pulse contour analysis, the cost of these devices may impede widespread use of SV/CO measurement. [17] The anesthetic monitor Life Scope J (Nihon Kohden, Tokyo, Japan) provides PI and 4 PPV measurements without any other devices.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%