Peri-implant bony overgrowth as a cause of revision surgery in auditory osseointegrated implantation

Tompkins, Jared J.; Petersen, Dana K.; Sharbel, Daniel D.; McKinnon, Brian J.; MacDonald, Charles B.

doi:10.1016/j.ijporl.2016.04.028

Cited by 4 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 10 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Both have similar audiological results, as discussed by Syms [68]. Safety issues in the Ponto System were reported in twelve studies in a total of 314 subjects, as discussed elsewhere [20,30,3,43,51,59,[61][62][63][64][65][66][67][68][69][70][71][72][73]. Also, the Ponto system due to its percutaneous nature reports a high incidence rate of complications with 44.6% out of which the majority was related to skin complications (37.3%).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 73%

The First Active Transcutaneous Bone Conduction Implant in Romania-Case Report of Permanent Conductive Hearing Loss Due to Cleft Palate

Georgescu

Baumgärtner

Modan

et al. 2018

TTEH

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Since the introduction of bone conduction hearing implants in 1977, quality of life of the implantees have improved substantially. The first available option were bone-anchored hearing devices, which improved sound quality, but had the major disadvantage of post-operative skin and wound infections. Therefore, new technologies seeking intact skin solution have emerged lately. The BONEBRIDGE system (MED-EL, Medical Electronics, Innsbruck, Austria) incorporates the first active bone conduction device, which especially aims to resolve abutment issues and still offers excellent audiological benefit. The successful implantation of this system in the first Romanian patient suffering from congenital lip and hard palate cleft with recurrent suppurative otitis media is presented. The authors report their experience with implantation, in terms of indications, selection assessment as well as functional results with a critical review of advantages and disadvantages in comparison with classical methods.

show abstract