2022
DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd005996.pub4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Peri-implantation glucocorticoid administration for assisted reproductive technology cycles

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 81 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These findings are consistent with a Cochrane meta-analysis that found no beneficial effect of peri-implantation corticosteroids in a nonselected IVF population, with regard to live birth, clinical pregnancy, and miscarriage rates. 22 Although the rates of overall pregnancy loss were similar between the 2 groups in this current trial, the risk of biochemical pregnancy loss appeared to be increased in the prednisone group. This is probably because prednisone could stimulate the secretion of hCG, 15 even though it did not increase the chance of implantation, leading to higher risk of pregnancy loss before clinical pregnancy.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 53%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…These findings are consistent with a Cochrane meta-analysis that found no beneficial effect of peri-implantation corticosteroids in a nonselected IVF population, with regard to live birth, clinical pregnancy, and miscarriage rates. 22 Although the rates of overall pregnancy loss were similar between the 2 groups in this current trial, the risk of biochemical pregnancy loss appeared to be increased in the prednisone group. This is probably because prednisone could stimulate the secretion of hCG, 15 even though it did not increase the chance of implantation, leading to higher risk of pregnancy loss before clinical pregnancy.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 53%
“…However, these studies were also limited by methodological weaknesses including combined regimens of either aspirin or low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH), small sample size, or nonrandomized or quasi-randomized design. A Cochrane review of 16 randomized trials showed no beneficial evidence of peri-implantation corticosteroids for clinical outcomes among the general IVF population but noted that this conclusion cannot be extrapolated to women with RIF …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…On the other hand, there are studies in which prednisolone showed no benefit in the improvement of the outcomes in RIF patients [93]. The results of a recent systematic review about the effect of prednisolone administration in women undergoing IVF or intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) indicated almost no significant difference in live birth and clinical pregnancy rate of corticoid versus no corticoid or placebo group [94].…”
Section: Corticosteroidsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Aim of corticosteroid therapy would be to reduce the aberrant populations of natural killer (NK) cells at the endometrium, to normalize cytokine expression, and/or to suppress endometrial inflammation [21]. A meta-analysis that included 16 RCTs with 2232 couples, showed insufficient evidences that peri-implantation glucocorticoid administration in IVF/ICSI cycles affects clinical outcomes [22]. A randomized study of 133 women who were positive for antinuclear antibodies (ANA) with a history of failed IVF implantation showed that combined treatment with prednisone 10 mg/day and aspirin 100 mg/day could improve the IVF outcome [23].…”
Section: Prednisonementioning
confidence: 99%