2012
DOI: 10.1111/cid.12001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Peri‐Implantitis versus Periodontitis: Functional Differences Indicated by Transcriptome Profiling

Abstract: Taken together, our results suggest considering periimplantitis and periodontitis as disease entities with shared as well as with distinct features, which should be reflected on the therapeutical as well as on the scientific level.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
133
1
2

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 113 publications
(140 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
4
133
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…9 Having said this, a recent investigation demonstrated significantly different mRNA signatures between periodontitis and peri-implantitis. 10 Therefore, a pertinent question in relation to implant therapy in patients susceptible to periodontitis is whether these patients may also show an elevated risk for periimplant tissue destruction. Thus, the aim of this metaanalysis is to compare the survival rate of dental implants, postoperative infection, and marginal bone loss of dental implants inserted in PCPs and in periodontally healthy patients (PHPs).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…9 Having said this, a recent investigation demonstrated significantly different mRNA signatures between periodontitis and peri-implantitis. 10 Therefore, a pertinent question in relation to implant therapy in patients susceptible to periodontitis is whether these patients may also show an elevated risk for periimplant tissue destruction. Thus, the aim of this metaanalysis is to compare the survival rate of dental implants, postoperative infection, and marginal bone loss of dental implants inserted in PCPs and in periodontally healthy patients (PHPs).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Exponential-phase cells of S. mutans were incubated with 1ϫ and 4ϫ the MIC of toremifene or chlorhexidine at 37°C under shaking conditions (see Table S1 in the supplemental material). At periodic intervals, aliquots taken from the samples were serially diluted in MgSO 4 and subsequently plated on TSB agar. After incubation for 2 days as 37°C, cell viability was determined by CFU counting.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Gram-negative anaerobic bacterium Porphyromonas gingivalis and the Gram-positive bacterium Streptococcus mutans are two important causative agents of oral infections. P. gingivalis is frequently involved in chronic inflammatory diseases, such as periodontitis and peri-implantitis, resulting in the destruction of soft and hard tissues surrounding teeth and dental implants, respectively (3,4). S. mutans is known to be the main pathogenic agent of dental caries, a chronic disease characterized by irreversible destruction of the tooth (5).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Accordingly, microbial biofilm on peri-implant surfaces induces an inflammatory response in susceptible hosts; this response involves features shared with and distinct from features of periodontitis. 40,41 The classic inflammatory peptides and proteins that respond to bacterial inflammation are cytokines and chemokines produced by T lymphocytes and monocytes/macrophages. In addition, many nonspecific markers of inflammation make up the inflammatory milieu.…”
Section: Inflammatory Biomarkersmentioning
confidence: 99%