Periapical health related to the type of coronal restorations and quality of root canal fillings in a Turkish subpopulation

Kayahan, Mehmet Baybora; Malkondu, Özlem; Canpolat, Ceyhun; Kaptan, Figen; Bayırlı, Gündüz; Kazazoğlu, Ender

doi:10.1016/j.tripleo.2007.07.044

Cited by 61 publications

(64 citation statements)

References 19 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…They concluded that apical periodontal health depended more on coronal restoration than on the technical quality of endodontic treatment. A perfect restoration to the periapical health is important and confirmed in previous studies [13][14][15][16].…”

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 59%

Effect of Intra-Orifice Barriers on the Fracture Resistance of Endodontically Treated Teeth – An Ex-Vivo Study

Aboobaker

Nair

Gopal

et al. 2015

JCDR

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 59%

Effect of Intra-Orifice Barriers on the Fracture Resistance of Endodontically Treated Teeth – An Ex-Vivo Study

Aboobaker

Nair

Gopal

et al. 2015

JCDR

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…Some authors consider the quality of endodontic treatment as the main factor associated with maintenance or development of periapical lesions [5,6,9]. However, the need for removal of the filling material is considered a critical factor.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Endodontically treated teeth should therefore be restored as soon as possible, preserving the antisepsis of the pulp cavity, considering that in addition to the technical quality of the endodontic treatment, adequate coronal restoration is correlated to high periapical success rates [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8]23]. So, it seems reasonable to think that the combination of good endodontic treatment followed by efficient cementing of the pin / restoration set may delay or hinder the access of contaminants from the oral cavity to the periapical region, possibly increasing the success rate of the dental treatment.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Evaluation of Apical Contamination in Teeth with Prefabricated Posts Fixed with Different Dental Cements

Machado¹,

Alvarez-Leite²,

Seraidarian³

et al. 2015

Pesqui. bras. odontopediatria clín. integr.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Objective: To assess the sealing capacity of different dental cements regarding apical microleakage on teeth with prefabricated posts. Material and Methods: Forty-eight single-rooted teeth were selected and, after having their coronal part removed at 10mm standard, underwent endodontic cleaning and preparation. The space for the post was prepared with # 3 Largo bur at 7 mm standard value. The study included the following groups: Group I, post prefabricated with # 1 intracanal glass fiber cemented with zinc phosphate cement (n = 12); Group II, post prefabricated with # 1 intracanal glass fiber cemented with conventional glass ionomer cement, Vidrion C (n = 12); Group III, post prefabricated with # 1 intracanal glass fiber cemented with chemical action resin cement, Multilink (n = 12). Two groups of six teeth each were also included, one as negative control group and the other as positive control. After cementing, teeth were tested through a dual-chamber experimental model, using Enterococcus Faecalis for apical contamination. Results: The control groups behaved as expected: positive control group with total contamination in 11 days and negative control group without any contaminated specimen within observation time of 60 days. Group I showed microleakage in all specimens for up to 29 days (100%). Group II and Group III showed microleakage in 50 and 49 specimens (83.33% and 75%) respectively along the research time of 60 days. Group 1 showed microleakage in all specimens for up to 29 days (100%). Group 2 and Group 3 showed microleakage in 50 and 49 specimens (83.33% and 75%) respectively along the research time of 60 days. The Log-Rank test showed differences between Groups 1 and 2 (p<0.05) and between Groups 1 and 3 (p<0.05). However, there was no difference between Groups 2 and 3 (p> 0.05). The results showed higher delay in bacterial infiltration in Groups 2 and 3 when compared to Group 1. Conclusion: No cement completely prevented infiltration during the experimental period. Zinc phosphate cement had the lowest apical sealing capacity while glass ionomer cement and resin cement showed similar results.

show abstract

“…Some authors concluded that the technical quality of the coronal restoration was more important than the endodontic treatment to the periapical health of the teeth endodontically treated [2,12]. On the other hand, other authors emphasize that quality of the endodontic treatment is more important than the restoration quality [3,13]; in the meantime, the majority of the studies had highlighted the association of a good endodontic treatment to an adequate coronal restoration [1,3,5,7,11,14].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Análise da infiltração bacteriana em dentes restaurados com núcleos metálicos fundidos e cimentados com diferentes tipos de cimento

Fernandes

Alvarez-Leite

Jansen

et al. 2015

Rev. Odonto Ciênc. (Online)

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Objective: The aim on this study was to evaluate the coronal infiltration of restored samples with cast post cores, cemented with different types of cement. Methods: Forty-eight rooted samples extracted from humans were instrumented with rotatory system and prepared dentist's drill wide to the confection of the molten core. The samples were divided in three experimental groups and two control groups. Group 1 was cemented with zinc phosphate cement; group 2 with glass ionomer cement, and group 3 with resin cement. The samples were assembled in a double chamber model system, and their leakage detector was the Enterococcus faecalis. The inoculation was renewed every three days during 60 days. The microleakage was daily evaluated through the observation of the culture medium regarding its turbidity. Results: Microleakage occurred in positive group. There was no microleakage in the negative group. It was detected 66, 66%, 25%, and 41, 66% of microleakage in groups 1, 2 and 3. The statistical analysis carried out by the Wilcoxon-test, revealed a considerable difference between cements, being the zinc phosphate cement the one with the worst results. Conclusion: The cementation procedure of molten metallic cores can be important to delay the contamination of teeth in need of coronal reconstruction.Key words: Dental cement; Microleakage; Cast post core Análise da infiltração bacteriana em dentes restaurados com núcleos metálicos fundidos e cimentados com diferentes tipos de cimento Resumo Objetivo: O objetivo deste estudo foi avaliar a infiltração bacteriana por via coronária de espécimes restaurados com núcleos metálicos fundidos e cimentados com três diferentes tipos de cimento. Métodos: 48 espécimes extraídos de humanos, que foram instrumentados com o sistema rotatório e preparados com broca para a confecção do núcleo metálico fundido. Os espécimes foram divididos em três grupos experimentais e dois grupos-controle. Grupo 1 foi cimentado com cimento fosfato de zinco; grupo 2 cimentado com cimento de ionômero de vidro e grupo 3 com cimento resinoso. Os espécimes foram montados em um sistema modelo de câmara dupla, e tiveram como indicador da infiltração o Enterococcus faecalis. A inoculação foi renovada a cada três dias, durante sessenta dias. A avaliação da infiltração foi realizada diariamente pela observação do meio de cultura quanto à turvação. Resultados: Em todos os espécimes do grupo-controle positivo, observou-se a presença de infiltração. No grupo-controle negativo, não ocorreu infiltração. Detectaram-se 66,66%, 25% e 41,66% de infiltração nos grupos 1, 2 e 3. A análise estatística realizada pelo Teste-Wilcoxon, mostrou haver diferença significativa entre os cimentos, com o cimento fosfato de zinco apresentando os piores resultados. Conclusão: O procedimento de cimentação de núcleos metálicos fundidos pode ser importante para retardar a contaminação em casos de dentes que necessitem de reconstrução coronária.

show abstract

Periapical health related to the type of coronal restorations and quality of root canal fillings in a Turkish subpopulation

Cited by 61 publications

References 19 publications

Effect of Intra-Orifice Barriers on the Fracture Resistance of Endodontically Treated Teeth – An Ex-Vivo Study

Effect of Intra-Orifice Barriers on the Fracture Resistance of Endodontically Treated Teeth – An Ex-Vivo Study

Evaluation of Apical Contamination in Teeth with Prefabricated Posts Fixed with Different Dental Cements

Análise da infiltração bacteriana em dentes restaurados com núcleos metálicos fundidos e cimentados com diferentes tipos de cimento

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About