2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2015.09.025
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Periarticular Injection After Total Knee Arthroplasty Using Liposomal Bupivacaine vs a Modified Ranawat Suspension: A Prospective, Randomized Study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
50
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 69 publications
(57 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
1
50
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[ [24][25][26][27][28][29][30]. The use of LB in the spine has not been investigated near the extent as it has been in TKA and the results from these studies have yet to yield a definitive conclusion.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[ [24][25][26][27][28][29][30]. The use of LB in the spine has not been investigated near the extent as it has been in TKA and the results from these studies have yet to yield a definitive conclusion.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In another RCT from Bramlett et al [22] In a recent RCT, Collis et al [23] compared liposomal bupivacaine injection with a mixture of ropivacaine, epinephrine, ketorolac and clonidine. Collis et al…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More recently, prospective studies were performed and compared the PAI with standard bupivacaine to the extended-release liposomal bupivacaine. Once again, in this randomized trial, the liposomal bupivacaine did not demonstrate superiority in terms of pain management, but it slighlty improved walking distances after TKA [6]. The additional cost of liposomal bupivacaine was not justified [15].…”
mentioning
confidence: 93%