2023
DOI: 10.1016/j.bjane.2023.07.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pericapsular Nerve Group (PENG) block versus fascia iliaca compartment (FI) block for hip surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Priscila P. Andrade,
Rafael A. Lombardi,
Isabela R. Marques
et al.
Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 34 publications
(53 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Recently, several systematic reviews and meta-analyses comparing PENG block and FICB for hip surgery have revealed somewhat inconsistent results. Andra et al [35] suggested that the PENG block reduces opioid consumption during the initial postoperative 24 h and decreases the pain score at rest at 12 h postoperatively compared to FICB. Another analysis [36] showed no difference in pain scores at 6, 12, and 24 h between PENG and FICB, but the mean opioid consumption in morphine equivalents was significantly lower with PENG compared to FICB.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, several systematic reviews and meta-analyses comparing PENG block and FICB for hip surgery have revealed somewhat inconsistent results. Andra et al [35] suggested that the PENG block reduces opioid consumption during the initial postoperative 24 h and decreases the pain score at rest at 12 h postoperatively compared to FICB. Another analysis [36] showed no difference in pain scores at 6, 12, and 24 h between PENG and FICB, but the mean opioid consumption in morphine equivalents was significantly lower with PENG compared to FICB.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%