Abstract:A premature infant developed pericardial effusion four days after the insertion of a 25-gauge silastic percutaneous central venous catheter. The effusion contained parenteral nutrition fluid and resolved rapidly after withdrawal of the catheter. Pericardial effusion is a potential complication of percutaneous, as well as surgically placed, central venous catheters.
“…[1][2][3][4] We found that the use of contrast improves the localisation of long lines on radiography, but that even when contrast is used, precise localisation can be difficult.…”
“…[1][2][3][4] We found that the use of contrast improves the localisation of long lines on radiography, but that even when contrast is used, precise localisation can be difficult.…”
“…2 There are a number of case reports of infants who have died or suffered significant morbidity as a consequence of pericardial tamponade. [3][4][5][6] One unit reported that pericardial effusion/tamponade occurred in 3% of inserted lines. 7 Reports in the popular press 8 have also suggested this to be a common complication and that doctors were putting infants lives at unnecessary risk by inserting PLLs.…”
“…Delayed effusion into either the pleural or pericardial space is an uncommon but well recognized complication of neonatal long line use. Pericardial effusion particularly may be associated with tamponade and infant death 6,7 . The UK Department of Health (DOH) guidelines recommend that the tip of the central line be positioned outside the chambers of the heart 8 although positioning the line tip outside the heart is still associated with complications 9 and migration is a recognized occurrence 10,11 .…”
Interobserver and intraobserver reliability was poor when using radiographs to assess long line tips. The major determinant of line repositioning was the perceived location.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.