2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.nrleng.2016.07.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pericranial nerve blockade as a preventive treatment for migraine: Experience in 60 patients

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
25
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Both the authors independently read the titles and the abstracts and excluded the articles which prima facie did not address our review question regarding the efficacy and safety of the GON block in CM. Thirteen open-label studies 29,[32][33][34][35][36][37][38][39][40][41][42][43] and 10 placebo-controlled trials [44][45][46][47][48][49][50][51][52][53] were read in detail. Of these, nine open-label studies 29,[34][35][36][38][39][40][41]43 and four placebo-controlled studies [47][48][49][50] were found suitable for the present review meeting the inclusion and exclusion criteria.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Both the authors independently read the titles and the abstracts and excluded the articles which prima facie did not address our review question regarding the efficacy and safety of the GON block in CM. Thirteen open-label studies 29,[32][33][34][35][36][37][38][39][40][41][42][43] and 10 placebo-controlled trials [44][45][46][47][48][49][50][51][52][53] were read in detail. Of these, nine open-label studies 29,[34][35][36][38][39][40][41]43 and four placebo-controlled studies [47][48][49][50] were found suitable for the present review meeting the inclusion and exclusion criteria.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Of these, nine open-label studies 29,[34][35][36][38][39][40][41]43 and four placebo-controlled studies [47][48][49][50] were found suitable for the present review meeting the inclusion and exclusion criteria. Four open-label 32,33,37,42 and six placebo-controlled studies [44][45][46][51][52][53] that were excluded for efficacy and safety analysis have been briefly described separately (Appendix 1) to highlight the reasons for their exclusion. because of biases, uncontrolled open-label studies often pave the way for the proper conduct of RCTs if some beneficial effects are observed and the hypothesis is generated.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In this review, 14 trials on GON block for migraine treatment are summarized; however, one of these trials consists of patients with migraine but also cluster headache, new daily persistent headache, and hemicrania continua (1528). Seven of these trials were RCTs (Table 1).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Lidocaine was used in one trial (16). In addition, a mixture of bupivacaine and mepivacaine (27) and a mixture of bupivacaine and lidocaine (15) was used in just one trial. (Table 1 and Table 2).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%