1989
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2559.1989.tb02176.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pericryptal fibroblasts or myofibroblaste?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2007
2007

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 1 publication
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Pericryptal cells are also desmin and caldesmon positive, which are markers more suggestive of true smooth-muscle than myofibroblastic differentiation [41][42][43]. Although incidental ultrastructural observations on the human pericryptal cells also suggest a primitive form of smooth-muscle differentiation to judge from the plaques, lamina and myofilaments [44], these cells none-the-less remain incompletely documented in terms of ultrastructure and ultraimmunophenotype: they may yet prove to be cells with intermediate characteristics, not entirely conforming to any one of the clearly defined cell types illustrated in Figure 3.…”
Section: • True Smooth-muscle Cells • Pericytes • Myoepithelium • Intmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Pericryptal cells are also desmin and caldesmon positive, which are markers more suggestive of true smooth-muscle than myofibroblastic differentiation [41][42][43]. Although incidental ultrastructural observations on the human pericryptal cells also suggest a primitive form of smooth-muscle differentiation to judge from the plaques, lamina and myofilaments [44], these cells none-the-less remain incompletely documented in terms of ultrastructure and ultraimmunophenotype: they may yet prove to be cells with intermediate characteristics, not entirely conforming to any one of the clearly defined cell types illustrated in Figure 3.…”
Section: • True Smooth-muscle Cells • Pericytes • Myoepithelium • Intmentioning
confidence: 98%