2022
DOI: 10.1038/s41570-022-00385-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Perils and promise of online exams

Abstract: As academic staff scrambled into emergency remote teaching during COVID-19 restrictions, we also had to move in-person exams online without compromising integrity. This disruption caused us to think carefully about how chemistry is assessed, because ‘business as usual’ was no longer possible — and at some institutions, there are no plans for in-person exams to return.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The practice of online assessment is fundamentally dominated by summative assessment, measuring the overall learning achievement of students ( Guangul et al, 2020 ). Herein, most online assessment platforms are built for one-way interaction where students are presented with assessment tasks and respond to it accordingly ( Schultz and Callahan, 2022 ). These platforms do not allow for more meaningful assessment practices that mimic the classroom environment where teachers can implement assessment as an integral part of learning and teaching processes ( Black and Wiliam, 2018 ).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The practice of online assessment is fundamentally dominated by summative assessment, measuring the overall learning achievement of students ( Guangul et al, 2020 ). Herein, most online assessment platforms are built for one-way interaction where students are presented with assessment tasks and respond to it accordingly ( Schultz and Callahan, 2022 ). These platforms do not allow for more meaningful assessment practices that mimic the classroom environment where teachers can implement assessment as an integral part of learning and teaching processes ( Black and Wiliam, 2018 ).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As open-ended questions were employed that asked for proof and justification in answers, students needed to apply their knowledge through analysis and critical thinking. Assessing chemical reasoning not only makes the assessment more authentic, but it can also support diverse groups of students to achieve . The examination was not proctoredstudents had access to the research papers and their lecture notes and could consult other resources such as using a calculator and accessing the Internet.…”
Section: Assessment Of Course Outcomesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Assessing chemical reasoning not only makes the assessment more authentic, but it can also support diverse groups of students to achieve. 23 The examination was not proctored�students had access to the research papers and their lecture notes and could consult other resources such as using a calculator and accessing the Internet. A paragraph on academic integrity was included at the start of the examination paper, which was publicized to students ahead of the examination.…”
Section: Summative Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such levels of misconduct are evident across many disciplines, including the fields of business, STEM subjects as well as law fields, for example (Gamage et al , 2020a; Gilmore et al , 2016). This also means that academic staff are under tremendous pressure and are concerned about maintaining the expected standards of the given qualifications as well as communicating ethics and good practices to students (Schultz and Callahan, 2022). Previous studies have highlighted that in terms of subject fields, business students are prone to greater levels of online exam cheating as opposed to STEM students (Lancaster and Cotarlan, 2021).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%