2016
DOI: 10.1002/ijch.201600071
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Perils of Polymorphism: Size Matters

Abstract: S ince the discoveryo fp olymorphismi n1 832, the ability of molecularc rystals to adopt different crystalf orms has intrigued and frustrated the scientific community. Control of this property has been limited by poor understanding of nucleation pathways and the absence of methods that can intercept crystallization at its earliest stages. Nonetheless, polymorphism,afavorite subject of Jack Dunitz, who is honored in this special issue, has opened aw indow into the forces that govern molecular organization in th… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 58 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…McCrone postulated many years ago that the number of polymorphic forms found is generally proportional to the effort expended in finding them . Still, seeing ten true polymorphs of any molecule is rare, even for those which have been intensively screened. , A substantially greater effort had gone into finding different polymorphs of GAL than, for example, ROY, where as many as 7 of 11 polymorphs have crystallized concomitantly from the same liquid. ,, Yet, we did not resort to exotic techniques, such as heteronucleation onto isostructural templates , or polymers, crystallization from complex mixtures, , or nucleation under confinement , to produce ten different polymorphs. All of the neat forms of GAL , with the notable exception of form X, were produced by conventional methods adapted to the formation of multiple solvates.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…McCrone postulated many years ago that the number of polymorphic forms found is generally proportional to the effort expended in finding them . Still, seeing ten true polymorphs of any molecule is rare, even for those which have been intensively screened. , A substantially greater effort had gone into finding different polymorphs of GAL than, for example, ROY, where as many as 7 of 11 polymorphs have crystallized concomitantly from the same liquid. ,, Yet, we did not resort to exotic techniques, such as heteronucleation onto isostructural templates , or polymers, crystallization from complex mixtures, , or nucleation under confinement , to produce ten different polymorphs. All of the neat forms of GAL , with the notable exception of form X, were produced by conventional methods adapted to the formation of multiple solvates.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This could be possible as crystallisation in the confinement of nanopores can result in a change in the stability ranking of polymorphs. 9,51,52 Nonetheless, we do not believe that this is the case here. Another explanation would be that the β form requires homogeneous nucleation, which would be in the absence of surface or foreign particles.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 68%
“…The relative stability of polymorphs can depend on the size of the crystal [ 72 ] and solvent at nanoscale sizes where the proportion of surface to bulk molecules is not negligible. This can help explain why confinement in nano-pores or droplets can affect the polymorph formed [ 73 ]. However, the observation of metastable polymorphs in tiny droplets can just reflect the inhibition of the transformation or lack of replenishment of the supersaturation [ 74 ].…”
Section: Why Does Csp Often Over-predict Polymorphism?mentioning
confidence: 99%