1994
DOI: 10.1161/01.hyp.23.3.325
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Perindopril changes the mesenteric pressure profile of conscious hypertensive and normotensive rats.

Abstract: Information about how antihypertensive therapy affects the arterial blood pressure profile in conscious animals is at present not available. Here we report measurements of part of the pressure profile in conscious spontaneously hypertensive rats (SHR, n=7) and Wistar-Kyoto (WKY, n=7) rats before and after treatment with the angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor perindopril. The previously developed technique that we used, provided simultaneous measurements of the undisturbed arterial blood pressure at the ba… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
10
0

Year Published

1994
1994
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
3
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our own opinion is that the fractional blood pressure drop to vessels of a certain size is about equal in normo- and hypertensive animals, suggesting that resistance artery abnormalities are widespread rather than localized to a certain part of the resistance vasculature. This is what we have observed in SHR in the conscious state in the intestinal circulation [32]. Given the discussion above, much of the heterogeneity may be ascribed to the different anesthetics and preparation procedures used.…”
Section: Resting Blood Pressure Profile In Hypertensionsupporting
confidence: 68%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Our own opinion is that the fractional blood pressure drop to vessels of a certain size is about equal in normo- and hypertensive animals, suggesting that resistance artery abnormalities are widespread rather than localized to a certain part of the resistance vasculature. This is what we have observed in SHR in the conscious state in the intestinal circulation [32]. Given the discussion above, much of the heterogeneity may be ascribed to the different anesthetics and preparation procedures used.…”
Section: Resting Blood Pressure Profile In Hypertensionsupporting
confidence: 68%
“…DeLano et al [18]observed the same in three different skeletal muscles in anesthetized 12- to 16-week-old SHR, as did Bohlen [30]in the brain of 4- to 5-week-old SHR and Roy and Mayrovitz [31]in the cremaster muscle of SHR. This has also been our experience in conscious SHR [32]. In contrast to these findings of normal blood pressure profile in hypertension, other investigators have reported that specific parts of the resistance vasculature are responsible for the increased resistance of SHR.…”
Section: Resting Blood Pressure Profile In Hypertensionsupporting
confidence: 60%
“…22 -25 Furthermore, it has been suggested that the macroarteries contribute to the increased peripheral resistance observed in anesthetized hypertensive rats. 22 - 24 Christensen and Murvany 26 recently reported that in normotensive and unanesthetized SHR, approximately one third of the resistance of the mesenteric bed lies in macroarteries. In addition, the perfusion pressure recorded in the larger mesenteric arteries reflects the resistance of the overall mesenteric bed (macroarteries and microarteries) calculated as the pressure-flow ratio.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It can also be argued that the ideal pressure would be that prevailing in vivo in the conscious animal, but in this regard, the in vivo pressure is not always known. However, it has been shown that the mean arterial pressure at the base of the mesenteric arcade of rats is approximately 60% of aortic mean arterial pressure in SHR and normotensive controls [24, 25]. Based upon the latter of these two studies, estimations of the pressures at this site in approximately 20-week-old SHR and WKY rats were reported to be 105 and 74 mmHg, respectively, by Bund [26], and 103 and 72 mm Hg, respectively, by Izzard et al [27].…”
Section: Consideration Of Methodologymentioning
confidence: 99%