Search citation statements
Paper Sections
Citation Types
Year Published
Publication Types
Relationship
Authors
Journals
Recently, large and homogeneous samples of cataclysmic variables identified by the Sloan Digital Sky Survey (SDSS) were published. In these samples, the famous orbital period gap, which is a dearth of systems in the orbital period range $ and the defining feature of most evolutionary models for has been claimed not to be clearly present. If true, this finding would completely change our picture of evolution. In this Letter we focus on potential differences with respect to the orbital period gap between in which the magnetic field of the white dwarf is strong enough to connect with that of the donor star, so-called polars, and non-polar as the white dwarf magnetic field in polars has been predicted to reduce the strength of angular momentum loss through magnetic braking. We separated the SDSS I-IV sample of into polars and non-polar systems and performed statistical tests to evaluate whether the period distributions are bimodal as predicted by the standard model for evolution or not. We also compared the SDSS\,I-IV period distribution of non-polars to that of other samples of cvs. We confirm the existence of a period gap in the SDSS\,I-IV sample of non-polar with $>98$ per cent confidence. The boundaries of the orbital period gap are $147$ and $191$ minutes, with the lower boundary being different to previously published values ($129$\,min). The orbital period distribution of polars from SDSS I-IV is clearly different and does not show a similar period gap. The SDSS samples as well as previous samples of are consistent with the standard theory of evolution. Magnetic braking does indeed seem get disrupted around the fully convective boundary, which causes a detached phase during evolution. In polars, the white dwarf magnetic field reduces the strength of magnetic braking and consequently the orbital period distribution of polars does not display an equally profound and extended period gap as non-polars. It remains unclear why the breaking rates derived from the rotation of single stars in open clusters favour prescriptions that are unable to explain the orbital period distribution of cvs.
Recently, large and homogeneous samples of cataclysmic variables identified by the Sloan Digital Sky Survey (SDSS) were published. In these samples, the famous orbital period gap, which is a dearth of systems in the orbital period range $ and the defining feature of most evolutionary models for has been claimed not to be clearly present. If true, this finding would completely change our picture of evolution. In this Letter we focus on potential differences with respect to the orbital period gap between in which the magnetic field of the white dwarf is strong enough to connect with that of the donor star, so-called polars, and non-polar as the white dwarf magnetic field in polars has been predicted to reduce the strength of angular momentum loss through magnetic braking. We separated the SDSS I-IV sample of into polars and non-polar systems and performed statistical tests to evaluate whether the period distributions are bimodal as predicted by the standard model for evolution or not. We also compared the SDSS\,I-IV period distribution of non-polars to that of other samples of cvs. We confirm the existence of a period gap in the SDSS\,I-IV sample of non-polar with $>98$ per cent confidence. The boundaries of the orbital period gap are $147$ and $191$ minutes, with the lower boundary being different to previously published values ($129$\,min). The orbital period distribution of polars from SDSS I-IV is clearly different and does not show a similar period gap. The SDSS samples as well as previous samples of are consistent with the standard theory of evolution. Magnetic braking does indeed seem get disrupted around the fully convective boundary, which causes a detached phase during evolution. In polars, the white dwarf magnetic field reduces the strength of magnetic braking and consequently the orbital period distribution of polars does not display an equally profound and extended period gap as non-polars. It remains unclear why the breaking rates derived from the rotation of single stars in open clusters favour prescriptions that are unable to explain the orbital period distribution of cvs.
Context. Period bouncers are cataclysmic variables (CVs) that have evolved past their orbital period minimum. The strong disagreement between theory and observations of the relative fraction of period bouncers is a severe shortcoming in the understanding of CV evolution. Aims. We test the implications of the hypothesis that magnetic braking (MB), which is suggested to be an additional angular momentum loss (AML) mechanism for CVs below the period gap (Porb ≲ 120 min), weakens around their period minimum. Methods. We computed the evolution of CV donors below the period gap using the MESA code, assuming that the evolution of the system is driven by AML due to gravitational wave radiation (GWR) and MB. We parametrised the MB strength as AMLMB = κAMLGWR. We computed two qualitatively different sets of models, one in which κ is a constant and another in which κ depends on stellar parameters in such a way that the value of κ decreases as the CV approaches the period minimum (Porb ≈ 80 min), beyond which κ ≈ 0. Results. We find that two crucial effects drive the latter set of models. (1) A decrease in κ as CVs approach the period minimum stalls their evolution so that they spend a long time in the observed period minimum spike (80 ≲ Porb/min ≲ 86). Here, they become difficult to distinguish from pre-bounce systems in the spike. (2) A strong decrease in the mass-transfer rate makes them virtually undetectable as they evolve further. So, the CV stalls around the period minimum and then “disappears”. This reduces the number of detectable bouncers. Physical processes, such as dynamo action, white dwarf magnetism, and dead zones, may cause such a weakening of MB at short orbital periods. Conclusions. The weakening MB formalism provides a possible solution to the problem of the dearth of detectable period bouncers in CV observational surveys.
Cataclysmic variables (CVs) with degenerate donors that have evolved past the period minimum are predicted to make up a great portion of the CV population, namely, between 40$<!PCT!>$ and 80$<!PCT!>$. However, either due to shortcomings in the models or the intrinsic faintness of these strongly evolved systems, only a few of these so-called "period-bouncers" have been confidently identified thus far. We compiled a multiwavelength catalog of period-bouncers and CVs around the period minimum from the literature to provide an in-depth characterization of the elusive subclass of period-bounce CVs that will support the identification of new candidates. We combined recently published or archival multiwavelength data with new X-ray observations from the all-sky surveys carried out with the extended ROentgen Survey with an Imaging Telescope Array (eROSITA) on board the Spektrum-Roentgen-Gamma spacecraft (SRG). Our catalog comprises 192 CVs around the period minimum, chosen as likely period-bounce candidates based on reported short orbital periods and low donor mass. This sample helped us establish specific selection parameters, which were used to compile a “scorecard” that rates the likelihood that a particular system is a period-bouncer. Our "scorecard" correctly assigns high scores to the already confirmed period-bouncers in our literature catalog. It has also identified 103 additional strong period-bounce candidates in the literature that had not previously been classified as such. We established two selection cuts based on the X-ray-to-optical flux ratio ($-1.21 opt 0$) and the typical X-ray luminosity x,bol erg/s ) observed from the eight period-bouncers that have already been confirmed with eROSITA data. These X-ray selection cuts led to the updated categorization of seven systems as new period-bouncers, increasing their known population to 24 systems in total. Our multiwavelength catalog of CVs around the period minimum drawn from the literature, together with X-ray data from eROSITA, has resulted in a $ increase in the population of period-bouncers. Both the catalog and "scorecard" we constructed will aid in future searches for new period-bounce candidates. These tools will contribute to the goal of resolving the discrepancy between the predicted high number of period-bouncers and the low number of these systems successfully observed to date.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2025 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.