1992
DOI: 10.1086/133045
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Period variation of the W UMa-type binary UZ Leonis

Abstract: It is shown that the well-known W Ursae Majoris-type eclipsing binary system UZ Leonis has an appreciable period increase. This conclusion is obtained by the analysis of 61 earlier times of minimum (available from the literature) and 13 newer ones (from photographic plates and photoelectric measurements). The period increase implies that the primary is accreting mass at a rate of M/M=5.4X 10" 8 yr" 1 .

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
12
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
1
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The quadratic term value is in agreement with that published by Hegedus & Jager (1992). A possible explanation for the (O–C) shape would be either mass transfer between the components as suggested by Hegedus & Jager (1992) or that, at this time, we see just part of a larger, cyclic curve due to a third body orbiting the contact system on a wide orbit. Our light‐curve solution might support the latter explanation: the resulting third light contribution is significant, reaching almost 14 per cent in the B filter.…”
Section: Discussion Of Results and Conclusionsupporting
confidence: 90%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The quadratic term value is in agreement with that published by Hegedus & Jager (1992). A possible explanation for the (O–C) shape would be either mass transfer between the components as suggested by Hegedus & Jager (1992) or that, at this time, we see just part of a larger, cyclic curve due to a third body orbiting the contact system on a wide orbit. Our light‐curve solution might support the latter explanation: the resulting third light contribution is significant, reaching almost 14 per cent in the B filter.…”
Section: Discussion Of Results and Conclusionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…Photoelectric observations from Binnendijk (1972) and Kaitchuck (1979) show smooth light curves, typical of a contact binary with total eclipses. Hegedus & Jager (1992) published a complete light curve in the V band and precise times of minima. Their (O–C) study resulted with the first estimation of the period increase rate [a quadratic term in the (O–C) fitting], which was suggested to be the result of mass transfer from the less massive to the more massive component.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Here we must point out a serious difficulty in determining the mass ratio photometrically when there are several significantly different values of q which reproduce the observed light curve equally satisfactorily as, for example, with FZ Ori q can vary from 0.2 to 0.9 [80,111] and UZ Leo, from 0.12 to 0.7 [69]. The difference in the spectroscopic and photometric mass ratios for the W UMa class has been studied by Pribulla et al [30] for a sample of 92 stars and a tertiary brightness that reduces the depth of the minima, the presence of gas in the system, and low quality photographic spectra were indicated as possible causes.…”
Section: Secular Variation In P Orbmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The details of Applegate's mechanism have been studied by Lanza et al (1998). They pointed out that apart from redistribution of the Zhai & Huang 1980;(6) Samec et al 1998; (7) Hegedus & Jager 1992;(8) Wolf & Molík 1996;(9) Herczeg 1993;(10) Qian 2001b;(11) Samec 1990;(12) Kim et al 1997;(13) Zhang et al 1989;(14) Borkovits & Hegedues 1996;(15) Pribulla et al 1999a;(16) Molík & Wolf 1998;(17) Kaszas et al 1998; (18) internal angular velocity, the change in the azimuthal field intensity can also produce a change in the oblateness of the active component. The connection between models of orbital period modulation and extant models of the generation of magnetic fields in stars with interior convection zones was also discussed by Lanza et al (1998).…”
Section: Possible Explanation Of Period Changementioning
confidence: 99%