2022
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-022-10647-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Periodic attention operates faster during more complex visual search

Abstract: Attention has been found to sample visual information periodically, in a wide range of frequencies below 20 Hz. This periodicity may be supported by brain oscillations at corresponding frequencies. We propose that part of the discrepancy in periodic frequencies observed in the literature is due to differences in attentional demands, resulting from heterogeneity in tasks performed. To test this hypothesis, we used visual search and manipulated task complexity, i.e., target discriminability (high, medium, low) a… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
8
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 96 publications
1
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Other studies suggested that the frequency of rhythmic sampling may depend on different factors, such as task difficulty (Chen et al, 2017) and the attentional demands during the task (Merholz et al, 2022), which is in line with our interpretation that the action-related modulation might be related to attentional engagement. An additional explanation for the different frequencies reported in different studies is that different periodic modulations coexist in the brain, and the brain circuits recruited to perform a specific task, or reset by a specific event, may be under the influence of one or the other process (VanRullen, 2016).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Other studies suggested that the frequency of rhythmic sampling may depend on different factors, such as task difficulty (Chen et al, 2017) and the attentional demands during the task (Merholz et al, 2022), which is in line with our interpretation that the action-related modulation might be related to attentional engagement. An additional explanation for the different frequencies reported in different studies is that different periodic modulations coexist in the brain, and the brain circuits recruited to perform a specific task, or reset by a specific event, may be under the influence of one or the other process (VanRullen, 2016).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…As aforementioned, studies applied dual tasks found that the phasic contributions of other cognitive functions can influence target perception, such as working memory (Balestrieri et al 2022) and motor actions (Tomassini et al 2017). Moreover, it is suspected that task parameters such as the number of sampling objects (Fiebelkorn et al 2013; Holcombe and Chen 2013; Re et al 2019), occurrence of distractors (Kawashima et al 2022), task difficulties (Chen et al 2017; Merholz et al 2022), rewards (Su et al 2021), and continuous response (Michel et al 2022; Song et al 2014) can influence the observed rhythms. In summary, our findings contribute to bridging the gap by demonstrating that the validity of spatial cues also influences sampling behavior.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In other words, visual performance fluctuates over time in the alpha band in detection tasks in which the target stimulus appeared always at the same spatial location (Valera et al, 1981; Busch et al, 2009; Mathewson et al, 2009; Busch and VanRullen, 2010; Dugué et al, 2011; Samaha and Postle, 2015; Samaha et al, 2017; Fakche et al, 2022). However, when multiple stimuli are presented, attention rhythmically samples information at the theta frequency (Dugué et al, 2015; Landau et al, 2012; Fiebelkorn et al, 2013a; Song et al, 2014; Huang et al, 2015; Dugué et al, 2019; Merholz et al, 2022; Galas et al, 2023; see also Re et al, 2023; review: VanRullen, 2016; Dugué and VanRullen, 2017; Kienitz et al, 2022; Keitel et al, 2022).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Visual perception fluctuates rhythmically along with the phase of low-frequency brain oscillations (theta, 4-7 Hz; alpha, 8-13 Hz) (Valera et al, 1981; Busch et al, 2009; Mathewson et al, 2009; Dugué et al, 2011, 2015; Samaha and Postle, 2015, Samaha et al, 2017; Fakche et al, 2022; Merholz et al, 2022; for review: VanRullen, 2016; Kienitz et al, 2022; Keitel et al, 2022). Studies suggest that this phase effect accounts for less than 20% of the trial-by-trial variability in behavioral performance (Busch et al, 2009; Busch and VanRullen, 2010; Dugué et al, 2011, 2015; Baumgarten et al, 2015; Samaha et al, 2017; Fakche et al, 2022).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%