“…] , giving easily, passing to the complementary, Ω μ κ,1 \ Ω μ κ,4 = Ω μ κ,2 ∪ Ω μ κ,3 and consequently Ω μ κ,4 = Ω μ κ,1 \ Ω μ κ,2 ∪ Ω μ κ,3 . Arguing as in [11,, we can prove that deg I − L −1 N d , Ω μ is well defined for every μ ∈ {1, 2, 3, 4} N −M , and it is equal to (−1) m , where m is the number of times the number 4 appears in the multi-index μ. In particular, we have that deg I − L −1 N d , Ω (4,4,...,4,4) = (−1) N −M = 0 .…”