2017
DOI: 10.1007/s00205-017-1206-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Periodic Solutions to a Cahn–Hilliard–Willmore Equation in the Plane

Abstract: In this paper we construct entire solutions to the Cahn-Hilliard equation −∆(−∆u + W (u)) + W (u)(−∆u + W (u)) = 0 in the Euclidean plane, where W (u) is the standard double-well potential 1 4(1 − u 2 ) 2 . Such solutions have a non-trivial profile that shadows a Willmore planar curve, and converge uniformly to ±1 as x2 → ±∞. These solutions give a counterexample to the counterpart of Gibbons' conjecture for the fourth-order counterpart of the Allen-Cahn equation. We also study the x2-derivative of these solut… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We will get rid of the terms (−1) 𝑖+1 [ Î𝑖,1 (𝑡, 𝑥) + Î𝑖,2 (𝑡, 𝑥) ] with 𝑖 = 1, … , 𝑘 in (2.12) to improve the approximate solution. Inspired by [14,15], we define the modifying functions as the following:…”
Section: 21mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We will get rid of the terms (−1) 𝑖+1 [ Î𝑖,1 (𝑡, 𝑥) + Î𝑖,2 (𝑡, 𝑥) ] with 𝑖 = 1, … , 𝑘 in (2.12) to improve the approximate solution. Inspired by [14,15], we define the modifying functions as the following:…”
Section: 21mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We will get rid of the terms false(1false)i+1[]trueÎi,1false(t,xfalse)+trueÎi,2false(t,xfalse)$(-1)^{i+1}\left[\, \widehat{\textrm {I}}_{i, 1}(t, x)+\widehat{\textrm {I}}_{i, 2}(t, x)\right]$ with i=1,,k$i=1, \ldots, k$ in () to improve the approximate solution. Inspired by [14, 15], we define the modifying functions as the following: ξi(t,x):=ω(x)0xω(s)20.16emnormaldssnormalIi(t,τ)ω(τ)normaldτ,$$\begin{equation} \widetilde{\xi }_i(t, x):=\omega ^{\prime }(x)\int _0^x{\left(\omega ^{\prime }(s)\right)}^{-2}\, {\mathrm{d}}s\int _{-\infty }^s\widetilde{\textrm {I}}_{i}(t, \tau)\omega ^{\prime }(\tau)\mathrm{d}\tau, \end{equation}$$for all i=1,,k$i=1, \ldots, k$, which satisfy []xxWfalse(ω(x)false)ξi(t,x)=normalIi(t,x),$$\begin{equation} {\left[\partial _{xx}-W^{\prime \prime }(\omega (x))\right]} \widetilde{\xi }_i(t, x)=\widetilde{\textrm {I}}_i(t, x)...…”
Section: The Ansatz and Settings Of The Proofsmentioning
confidence: 99%