2022
DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361/202244037
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Periodic variable A-F spectral type stars in the northern TESS continuous viewing zone

Abstract: Context. In the time of large space surveys that provide tremendous amounts of precise data, it is highly desirable to have a commonly accepted methodology and system for the classification of variable stars. This is especially important for A-F stars, which can show intrinsic brightness variations due to both rotation and pulsations. Aims. The goal of our study is to provide a reliable classification of the variability of A-F stars brighter than 11 mag located in the northern TESS continuous viewing zone. We … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 91 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This may be caused by the fact that some short-period ellipsoidal variable stars are usually classified as EW-type eclipsing binaries. Ellipsoidal variable stars and low-amplitude EW-type eclipsing binaries are not easily distinguished directly by light curves (Dal & Sipahi 2013;Li & Liu 2021;Skarka et al 2022). However, in this paper, the selection of our sample with amplitudes greater than 0.2 mag has led to the early exclusion of many ellipsoidal variable stars that have been misclassified as low-amplitude EW-type eclipsing binaries.…”
Section: Parameter Distributionmentioning
confidence: 86%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This may be caused by the fact that some short-period ellipsoidal variable stars are usually classified as EW-type eclipsing binaries. Ellipsoidal variable stars and low-amplitude EW-type eclipsing binaries are not easily distinguished directly by light curves (Dal & Sipahi 2013;Li & Liu 2021;Skarka et al 2022). However, in this paper, the selection of our sample with amplitudes greater than 0.2 mag has led to the early exclusion of many ellipsoidal variable stars that have been misclassified as low-amplitude EW-type eclipsing binaries.…”
Section: Parameter Distributionmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…Based on the mean magnitude distribution of ASAS-SN (Jayasinghe et al 2018), we select targets with a mean V-band magnitude less than 15 mag; this includes the vast majority of targets. We also select targets with amplitudes greater than 0.2 mag because many ellipsoidal variable stars have amplitudes less than 0.2 mag and they are often mistaken for low-amplitude EW-type eclipsing binaries (Dal & Sipahi 2013;Li & Liu 2021;Skarka et al 2022). The Laflfler-Kinman string length (LKSL) statistic (Lafler & Kinman 1965;Clarke 2002) is a measure of scatter in the light curve of periodic variables.…”
Section: Sample Selectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, progress can be ensured by analyzing the thousands of light curves for the SPB and γ Dor candidates from TESS data assembled throughout the nominal and extended mission, covering more than five years. The catalogues from Pedersen et al (2019), Antoci et al (2019), andSkarka et al (2022) are only the tip of the iceberg in discovery space for TESS gravito-inertial asteroseismology.…”
Section: Discussion and Future Prospectsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…10 mmag) and dense pulsation spectra with typical periods between 0.3 and 3 d, the advent of space missions gave a large boost to the detection and observational analysis of g-mode pulsators (e.g. Tkachenko et al 2013;Van Reeth et al 2015b;Li et al 2020b;Garcia et al 2022;Skarka et al 2022).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%