Periodontal complications

and, Deborah A. Termeie; Camargo, Paulo M.

doi:10.1002/9781118988053.ch2

Cited by 2 publications

(2 citation statements)

References 61 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Since then, implants have undergone a great evolution in shape, size, and surface to continuously improve implant survival and success. Simultaneously, specific criteria have been developed to objectively define the success of an implant, including immobility, absence of peri-implant radiolucency, marginal bone loss less than 1 mm during the first year in function and 0.2 mm annually after, a width of attached gingiva >2 mm, absence of pain, infection, paresthesia, other neuropathies, and the procedure performed without complications [ 3 , 4 , 5 ]. Unfortunately, of the five million implants placed by dentists in the United States per year, approximately 1–2% of patients experience primary implant failure due to inadequate osseointegration, while about 5% of patients experience secondary implant failure caused by peri-implantitis [ 6 , 7 ].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

The Impact of Dental Implant Surface Modifications on Osseointegration and Biofilm Formation

Kligman

Ren

Chung

et al. 2021

JCM

189

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Implant surface design has evolved to meet oral rehabilitation challenges in both healthy and compromised bone. For example, to conquer the most common dental implant-related complications, peri-implantitis, and subsequent implant loss, implant surfaces have been modified to introduce desired properties to a dental implant and thus increase the implant success rate and expand their indications. Until now, a diversity of implant surface modifications, including different physical, chemical, and biological techniques, have been applied to a broad range of materials, such as titanium, zirconia, and polyether ether ketone, to achieve these goals. Ideal modifications enhance the interaction between the implant’s surface and its surrounding bone which will facilitate osseointegration while minimizing the bacterial colonization to reduce the risk of biofilm formation. This review article aims to comprehensively discuss currently available implant surface modifications commonly used in implantology in terms of their impact on osseointegration and biofilm formation, which is critical for clinicians to choose the most suitable materials to improve the success and survival of implantation.

show abstract

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

The Impact of Dental Implant Surface Modifications on Osseointegration and Biofilm Formation

Kligman

Ren

Chung

et al. 2021

JCM

189

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Such example is the low bond strength of the composite to dentin, especially the dentin tissue. To solve this issue, various dental adhesive systems with different characteristics have been developed by dentistry experts ( 2 , 3 ). Discovery of different generations of adhesives has resulted in increased shear bond strength (SBS) of composite to dentin.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Laboratory evaluation of the effect of unfilled resin after the use of self-etch and total-etch dentin adhesives on the Shear Bond Strength of composite to dentin

2017

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

BackgroundBased on the frequent application of composite resins as tooth-colored fillings, this method is considered a viable alternative to dental amalgam. However, this method has the low bond strength of the composite to dentin. To solve this issue, various dental adhesive systems with different characteristics have been developed by dentistry experts.AimTo assess the effect of an additional layer of unfilled resin in self-etch and total-etch dentin adhesives on the shear bond strength (SBS) of composite to dentin. Moreover, we assessed the effects of sample storage in artificial saliva on the SBS of composite to dentin.MethodsMethods: This experimental study was conducted on 160 freshly extracted human first or second premolar teeth, which were randomly divided into 16 groups. The teeth were prepared from Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran (2008–2009). Scotchbond Multi-purpose (SBMP), single bond (SB), Clearfil SE Bond, and Clearfil S3 Bond were applied to dentin surface with or without the placement of hydrophobic resin (Margin Bond) in accordance with the instructions of the manufacturers. To expose the coronal dentin, the teeth were abraded with 600 grit SiC paper. Immediately after restoration, half of the samples were tested in terms of SBS, while the other samples were evaluated in terms of SBS after three months of storage in artificial saliva. SBS rates of dental composites evaluated by universal testing machine and samples were studied by optical stereomicroscopy to verify the failure type. Data analysis was performed in SPSS V.16 using Kolmogorov-Smirnov test, independent-samples t-test, ANOVA, and Duncan’s logistic regression test.ResultsIn this study, a significant reduction was observed in the SBS rates of SB and S3 bond adhesive systems after storage with and without hydrophobic resin (p>0.000). Without storage in normal saline, a significant increase was observed in the SBS rate of the SE bond (p=0.013). In addition, SBS rate of SBMP significantly increased after storage with hydrophobic resin (p=0.001). Finally, the highest and lowest rates of SBS were observed in the SE and S3 bonds in all the experimental groups, respectively.ConclusionThe effects of using a hydrophobic resin layer on shear bond strength values seem to be effective. The mild self-etch adhesive exhibited the best resin-dentine bond strength after aging

show abstract

Periodontal complications

Cited by 2 publications

References 61 publications

The Impact of Dental Implant Surface Modifications on Osseointegration and Biofilm Formation

The Impact of Dental Implant Surface Modifications on Osseointegration and Biofilm Formation

Laboratory evaluation of the effect of unfilled resin after the use of self-etch and total-etch dentin adhesives on the Shear Bond Strength of composite to dentin

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About