Periodontal status in long-term orthodontic retention patients up to 10 years after treatment – a cross-sectional study

Salvesen, Barbro Fostad; Grytten, Jostein; Rongen, Gunnar; Koldsland, Odd Carsten; Vandevska‐Radunovic, Vaska

doi:10.1080/00016357.2021.1921842

Cited by 5 publications

(5 citation statements)

References 33 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…We previously demonstrated that smoking was associated with gingival bleeding evident upon clinical examination [21]. The current study also showed that patient-reported gingival bleeding was associated with smoking.…”

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 76%

“…Patient demographics for the study population were previously reported by the research group (Table 1) [21]. Seventy-seven percent of the patients experienced no difficulty maintaining oral hygiene, and 13% experienced dental sensitivity (Table 2).…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The current study was conducted on the same patient population as was explored in a previous report by the research group [21]. In brief, the study comprised patients who underwent routine retention control between three and ten years after orthodontic treatment at the Department of Orthodontics, University of Oslo.…”

Section: Study Populationmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

Patient-Reported Outcome Measures on Oral Hygiene, Periodontal Health, and Treatment Satisfaction of Orthodontic Retention Patients up to Ten Years after Treatment—A Cross-Sectional Study

Salvesen

Grytten

Rongen

et al. 2022

IJERPH

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background: This cross-sectional study evaluated patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) on (1) oral hygiene, (2) periodontal health, (3) retainer failure, (4) orthodontic treatment satisfaction, and (5) outcome satisfaction in orthodontic retention patients. The purpose of the study was to evaluate whether orthodontic retention treatment is associated with patient-reported outcome measures on oral hygiene, periodontal health, and treatment satisfaction. Methods: A ten-item questionnaire on the five PROMs was conducted among 211 consecutive retention patients up to ten years following orthodontic treatment. Linear regression models were computed to detect possible associations between the PROMs and retention treatment or patient characteristics. Results: The presence of a fixed lingual retainer was not associated with the reduced ability to perform oral hygiene, self-perceived periodontal health, or orthodontic outcome satisfaction. Older patients were more content with the orthodontic treatment result (p < 0.05). Patients with fixed lingual retainers in the mandible were less satisfied with the course of orthodontic treatment (p < 0.05). Smokers more often reported gingival bleeding (p < 0.05). Females reported increased gingival recessions (p < 0.05) and perceived their teeth as longer than before treatment (p < 0.05). Longer orthodontic treatment duration corresponded to retainer failure (p < 0.05). Conclusions: In general, long-term orthodontic retention patients were satisfied with orthodontic treatment. These patients reported the satisfactory ability to perform adequate oral hygiene and periodontal health, and they communicated a high degree of treatment and outcome contentment. However, patients with a retainer in the mandible were less satisfied with orthodontic treatment.

show abstract

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 76%

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Patient-Reported Outcome Measures on Oral Hygiene, Periodontal Health, and Treatment Satisfaction of Orthodontic Retention Patients up to Ten Years after Treatment—A Cross-Sectional Study

Salvesen

Grytten

Rongen

et al. 2022

IJERPH

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Salvesen et al ( 2021) [96] concluded that prolonged fixed retention per se does not have harmful periodontal outcomes, but coexisting factors such as smoking and hand dexterity may increase the risk of plaque accumulation causing inflammation. In fact, their sample self-reported that they felt confident for effective oral hygiene.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Orthodontic Retainers—A Critical Review

et al. 2023

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The achievement of aesthetic, functional occlusion should not mark the end of the orthodontic intervention. To prevent relapse, retention needs advance planning, and may vary in duration. This review aims to present and comment on the available means of retention. The ever-popular, passive Hawley-like removable appliances are credible in maintaining the desired occlusion. Modifications are the removable appliance Wrap Around, having the labial archwire extending to the premolars; the translucent retainer, Astics, a unique aesthetic Hawley-type device; and the reinforced removable retainer, which features a metallic grid reinforcing the acrylic base. Vacuum-formed retainers are easy to fabricate and are readily prescribed. By contrast, fixed retainers are made of orthodontic wire and composite resin bonded on the lingual or palatal surfaces of the anterior teeth. Patient-related variables need evaluation to select the appropriate retainer, while patients ought to realize the importance of retention and comply with offered guidance. Overall, the orthodontist is responsible for keeping the patient informed on the properties and the duration of retention, even before starting active orthodontic treatment.

show abstract

“…10 In general, it does not seem that the mere presence of xed retainers alone is associated with harmful effects on periodontal health, but additional predisposing factors such as the cumulative effect of age and the difference in the gender of patients (due to the difference in attention level to hygiene habits), may increase the risk of plaque deposition and pocket depth. 11 Before treatment, the orthodontist must make sure that the patient is able to perform adequate oral hygiene instructions. In patients who do not follow the necessary oral and dental hygiene tips, active orthodontic treatment should also be postponed until satisfactory plaque control is achieved.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Perception and practice of patients with fixed orthodontic appliance regarding oral health: A cross-sectional study in Yazd, Iran

Zeighami

Maybodi

Toodehzaeim

2022

Preprint

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Introduction: Good oral hygiene is the key factor required for uninterrupted orthodontic treatment and can be improved by professional supervision. Aims: To report perception and practice of patients with fixed orthodontic appliance about oral health in Yazd, Iran. Materials and Methods: In this cross-sectional study, 201 patients were selected by simple sampling method. A valid, reliable, researcher-made questionnaire with four parts was used: the first part contains demographic information of patients, the second part contained 7 questions about knowledge and the third part contained 7 attitudinal questions and the last part had 8 practical questions regarding oral health. The data were analyzed using SPSS version 25 software, T-test and ANOVA. The level of significance in this study was considered less than 0.05. Results: Out of 201 patients, 74 (36.8%) were men and 127 (63.2%) were women. 19.65 ± 6.03 with an age range of 10-37 years. The participants had a moderate knowledge and poor practice. No significant association was observed between the knowledge OR practice of patients with gender, age, education and duration of treatment (P-value>0.05). Conclusion: It is suggested to adopt educational interventions in order to improve patients’ knowledge and practice about oral hygiene. Some individual attitudes such as considering orthodontic treatment during pregnancy as safe and the possibility of orthodontic treatment in adulthood, need to be corrected.

show abstract

Periodontal status in long-term orthodontic retention patients up to 10 years after treatment – a cross-sectional study

Abstract: Vandevska-Radunovic (2021): Periodontal status in long-term orthodontic retention patients up to 10 years after treatment -a cross-sectional study, Acta Odontologica Scandinavica,

Cited by 5 publications

References 33 publications

Patient-Reported Outcome Measures on Oral Hygiene, Periodontal Health, and Treatment Satisfaction of Orthodontic Retention Patients up to Ten Years after Treatment—A Cross-Sectional Study

Patient-Reported Outcome Measures on Oral Hygiene, Periodontal Health, and Treatment Satisfaction of Orthodontic Retention Patients up to Ten Years after Treatment—A Cross-Sectional Study

Orthodontic Retainers—A Critical Review

Perception and practice of patients with fixed orthodontic appliance regarding oral health: A cross-sectional study in Yazd, Iran

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About