Periodontal tissue responses after insertion of artificial crowns and fixed partial dentures

Knoernschild, Kent L.; Campbell, Stephen D.

doi:10.1067/mpr.2000.110262

Cited by 125 publications

(99 citation statements)

References 58 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…In addition, the mean and ±SD of plaque and gingival indices in restoring teeth scored significantly higher than the mean and ±SD scores of plaque and gingival indices of non-restored teeth. These findings are in agreement with different other studies deciding increased plaque formation and gingival inflammation on teeth with dental restorations and there is a public agreement of the closely related between the dental plaque and presence of gingivitis [25] [26]. In another study on FPDs (Fixed Partial denture) and crowns that was carried out by Kent Kent et al, in 2002, there was increased in progressive of gingival inflammation neighboring to dental restorations particularly when the margins extend subgingivally, rough surface and poor adaptation, these findings agree with the results of our study.…”

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 82%

Clinical and Radiographic Evaluation of Marginal Bone Loss and Periodontal Parameters after Various Dental Reconstruction Procedures

Al-Abdaly¹,

Khawshal²,

Alqisi³

et al. 2018

IJCM

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background: Periodontal disease is a bacterial infection that causes bone resorption of bone supporting teeth and leads to change in the normal architecture of the alveolar process. There are instances where the technique sensitive nature of restorative procedures or the faulty restorative margins may inadvertently lead to conditions which could bring about periodontal disease/ destruction. Therefore, this study was designed to determine the impact of dental restorations type on marginal bone among some patients being treated for chronic periodontitis. Material and Methods: Three hundred patients from the periodontics clinics in college of dentistry, King Khalid university were participated in our study. A total of 292 patients completed the study, 152 males and 140 female. They were divided according to dental reconstructions into three groups: Group I was without dental reconstructions (control group), group II patients received amalgam class II fillings and group III received fixed bridge denture. Plaque index (PLI) gingival index (GI), clinical attachment loss (CAL) and marginal bone loss (MBL) were recorded. All data were collected and were analyzed by ANOVA test. Results: In the present study, the restored teeth revealed significantly higher mean values for PLI, GI, CAL and MBL than the non-restored teeth (p-value < 0.05). Conclusion: Although the limitations of the present study, the patients in group II had the highest clinical attachment loss and value of marginal bone loss which can explain the more extension of amalgam fillings into subgingival direction, leading to increased plaque accumulation and increased periodontal destruction.

show abstract

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 82%

Clinical and Radiographic Evaluation of Marginal Bone Loss and Periodontal Parameters after Various Dental Reconstruction Procedures

Al-Abdaly¹,

Khawshal²,

Alqisi³

et al. 2018

IJCM

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…1,6,8,9,22 Clinical studies are time consuming and in addition, it is often difficult to standardise the test parameters. 20 Therefore, long-term results regarding the marginal fit can be obtained by in vitro tests.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…[2][3][4][5] The extent of misfit of dental restorations is closely associated with the development of secondary caries and periodontitis. [6][7][8] Misfit in all-ceramic crowns can also affect their fracture strength 9 and thus reduce longevity. Today there are ceramic systems available (In-Ceram®, Vita Zahnfabrik GmbH; Empress®2, Ivoclar-Vivadent AG; Cerec®, Sirona Dental Systems GmbH; Procera AllCeram®, Nobel Biocare etc.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Marginal adaptation of three-unit fixed partial dentures constructed from pressed ceramic systems

et al. 2004

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Purpose This study compares the marginal accuracy of posterior metal ceramic (MC), all-ceramic IPS Empress®2 and experimental pressed ceramic (EPC-VP 1989/4) three-unit fixed partial dentures (FPD), before and after luting and after thermo-mechanical fatigue in a dual-axis chewing simulator. Materials and methods Caries-free human teeth (n=160) were used as abutments for the fabrication of eighty posterior three-unit FPD, divided into two test-groups, IPS Empress®2 and EPC, of 32 samples each and one control group of 16 samples metal ceramic FPD. All FPD were cemented with Variolink®II dual-curing resin cement. Half of the samples in each group were exposed to a dual-axis chewing simulator. Results The geometric mean marginal gap values (µm, before cementation, after cementation and after thermo-mechanical fatigue) amounted to 53, 63 and 62 for the ceramic metal FPD, 57, 71 and 68 for the Empress®2 FPD and 55, 67 and 68 for the EPC FPD. In all groups a statistically significant increase in marginal gap width was observed after cementation. The effect of functional loading in the chewing simulator on marginal gap was not significant. Marginal gap was lowest in the control group but differences with all-ceramic materials were small in all evaluation stages. Conclusion Within the limits of this investigation, it can be concluded that marginal gap values of these all-ceramic materials and conventional MC techniques are on a similar level. In particular, almost all marginal gap values observed in this study were within the limits of clinical acceptance.

show abstract

“…However, intervention should be considered carefully as in some cases it may be detrimental to the remaining dentition. [9][10][11] General factors such as the health, age of the patient, their expectations, local factors related to dental health and the missing tooth itself need to be taken into account. For example in older patients with reduced manual dexterity it may be appropriate to accept a shortened dental arch rather than replacing a lost posterior unit.…”

Section: Case Selection I) Patient Factorsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Resin bonded bridges: techniques for success

Durey

Nixon²,

Robinson

et al. 2011

Br Dent J

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Periodontal tissue responses after insertion of artificial crowns and fixed partial dentures

Cited by 125 publications

References 58 publications

Clinical and Radiographic Evaluation of Marginal Bone Loss and Periodontal Parameters after Various Dental Reconstruction Procedures

Clinical and Radiographic Evaluation of Marginal Bone Loss and Periodontal Parameters after Various Dental Reconstruction Procedures

Marginal adaptation of three-unit fixed partial dentures constructed from pressed ceramic systems

Resin bonded bridges: techniques for success

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About